Annette Thomas
- Neurology top 10%
- Physiology
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 2%
- Co-authors
- Pietro De CamilliH.-M. MeinckG FassettaRoxanne CofiellFranco FolliG. PiccoloM AustoniG. F. Bottazzo
- Topics
- Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (15 papers)Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers)Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistryThe Journal of Experimental MedicineJournal of Clinical Oncology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Annette Thomas
28 papers receiving 630 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Neurology 187
- Physiology 182
- Molecular Biology 131
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 127
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 101
Countries citing papers authored by Annette Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Annette Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annette Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annette Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annette Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annette Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annette Thomas. The network helps show where Annette Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annette Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annette Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annette Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annette Thomas. Annette Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 62 | |
| 18 | 251 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | Law Affecting the Quality of the Marine Environment | 0 |
About Annette Thomas
Annette Thomas is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Medical Laboratory Technology and Physiology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (15 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (101 citations), Neurology (187 citations) and Physiology (182 citations). Annette Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Pietro De Camilli, H.-M. Meinck, G Fassetta, Roxanne Cofiell, Franco Folli, G. Piccolo, M Austoni, G. F. Bottazzo, Marc Thelen and Nuthar Jassam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.