Peter E. Stokes

106 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Peter E. Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Biological Psychiatry 665
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 864
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 918
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 321
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 462
Replace Paul J. Orsulak with:
Paul J. Orsulak United States
Holger Jahn Germany
Russell E. Poland United States
Robert N. Golden United States
Ingvar Karlsson Sweden
Robert T. Rubín United States
Teruhiko Higuchi Japan
Peter de Boer Netherlands
Markku Linnoila United States
Murad Atmaca Türkiye
Peter E. Stokes relative to Paul J. Orsulak United States Paul J. Orsulak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Paul J. Orsulak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter E. Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter E. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter E. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter E. Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter E. Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter E. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter E. Stokes. The network helps show where Peter E. Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter E. Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter E. Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Peter E. Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984321
2 1970282
3 1985184
4 1995155
5 1985122
6 1997104
7 197585
8 199380
9 199279
10 199378
11 200977
12 201074
13 199966
14 198464
15 199863
16 200361
17 198061
18 197359
19 198754
20 198853

About Peter E. Stokes

Peter E. Stokes is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 106 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (26 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (23 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (18 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (16 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (11 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (9 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (665 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (864 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (918 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (321 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (462 citations). Peter E. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James H. Kocsis, Carolyn R. Sikes, Gavin O’Connor, R. G. Brayton, Donald B. Louria, Melvin S. Schwartz, Aliza Holtz, Peter Stoll, Stephen H. Koslow and Charles P. Pollak. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, Journal of Affective Disorders and Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026