Anna Carobene

3.4k citations
99 papers · 2.3k indexed · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Carobene

94 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Anna Carobene
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Health Informatics 215
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 504
  • Statistics and Probability 333
  • Physiology 1.0k
  • Nephrology 229
Replace Janne Cadamuro with:
Janne Cadamuro Austria
Wytze P. Oosterhuis Netherlands
Alexander Meyer Germany
Abdurrahman Coşkun Türkiye
Pilar Fernández–Calle Spain
Federica Braga Italy
Patrick J. Twomey United Kingdom
Torgny Groth Sweden
Lilly Q. Yue United States
Aasne K. Aarsand Norway
Anna Carobene relative to Janne Cadamuro Austria Janne Cadamuro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Janne Cadamuro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Carobene

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Carobene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Carobene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Carobene more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Carobene

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Carobene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Carobene. The network helps show where Anna Carobene may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Carobene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Carobene Line = papers co-authored together Anna Carobene links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20245
4 202315
5 20232
6 20234
7 20231
8 20234
9 20211
10 20219
11 2021155
12 2020110
13 20205
14 202011
15 20207
16 201846
17 20134
18 201226
19 200425
20
Accuracy of cholesterol measurements in Italian clinical laboratories. Joint project GISSI prevention--Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry. SIBioC GISSI Prevenzione Group.
19971

About Anna Carobene

Anna Carobene is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Statistics and Probability, Physiology and Nephrology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (41 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (20 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (17 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (10 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (9 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (6 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (215 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (504 citations), Statistics and Probability (333 citations), Physiology (1.0k citations) and Nephrology (229 citations). Anna Carobene has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Türkiye and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Sverre Sandberg, Abdurrahman Coşkun, Pilar Fernández–Calle, Ferruccio Ceriotti, William A. Bartlett, Jorge Díaz–Garzón, Federico Cabitza, Aasne K. Aarsand, Niels Jonker and Thomas Røraas. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Clinica Chimica Acta, Clinical Chemistry, Human Genetics and Electrophoresis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026