Anne‐Thea McGill
- Physiology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Sally D. PoppittFiona E. LithanderCaroline M. StrikJoanna StewartStephanie BudgettBrian H. McArdleJohn R. IngramAlastair MacGibbon
- Topics
- Diet and metabolism studies (14 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers)Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaFrance
In The Last Decade
Anne‐Thea McGill
27 papers receiving 900 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Physiology 418
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 268
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 257
- Nutrition and Dietetics 234
- Clinical Psychology 103
Countries citing papers authored by Anne‐Thea McGill
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne‐Thea McGill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne‐Thea McGill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne‐Thea McGill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne‐Thea McGill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne‐Thea McGill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne‐Thea McGill. The network helps show where Anne‐Thea McGill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne‐Thea McGill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne‐Thea McGill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne‐Thea McGill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne‐Thea McGill. Anne‐Thea McGill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 73 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 249 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | Supplementation of a high-carbohydrate breakfast with barley beta-glucan improves postprandial glycaemic response for meals but not beverages. | 46 |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 100 | |
| 20 | Multiple and single frequency bioelectrical impedance (BIA) methods are not interchangeable for the prediction of body fluid volumes in overweight individuals | 1 |
About Anne‐Thea McGill
Anne‐Thea McGill is a scholar working on Physiology, Pharmacy and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 27 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (14 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers) and Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (418 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (234 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (257 citations). Anne‐Thea McGill has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Sally D. Poppitt, Fiona E. Lithander, Caroline M. Strik, Joanna Stewart, Stephanie Budgett, Brian H. McArdle, John R. Ingram, Alastair MacGibbon, Bruce Arroll and S.D. Poppitt. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, The FASEB Journal and International Journal of Obesity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.