Annemieke Luiten

496 total citations
19 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

Annemieke Luiten is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Annemieke Luiten has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Annemieke Luiten's work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (11 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). Annemieke Luiten is often cited by papers focused on Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (11 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). Annemieke Luiten collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Annemieke Luiten's co-authors include Barry Schouten, Edith D. de Leeuw, Joop J. Hox, Tjeert Olthof, Tamara J. Ferguson, Peter Lugtig, Brendan Gail Rule, Vera Toepoel, Bella Struminskaya and Marieke Haan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Child Development and International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

In The Last Decade

Annemieke Luiten

17 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annemieke Luiten Netherlands 8 223 103 80 30 29 19 321
Yajuan Si United States 9 70 0.3× 28 0.3× 132 1.6× 39 1.3× 9 0.3× 25 285
Joe S. Cecil United States 11 96 0.4× 97 0.9× 53 0.7× 51 1.7× 9 0.3× 32 404
Tarek Al Baghal United Kingdom 10 175 0.8× 38 0.4× 23 0.3× 27 0.9× 7 0.2× 32 278
Aigul Mavletova Russia 8 271 1.2× 23 0.2× 17 0.2× 35 1.2× 26 0.9× 13 355
T. Scott Murray Canada 7 69 0.3× 39 0.4× 31 0.4× 48 1.6× 47 1.6× 11 344
Wolfgang Bandilla Germany 10 239 1.1× 21 0.2× 23 0.3× 22 0.7× 3 0.1× 21 327
Abt Associates 9 96 0.4× 22 0.2× 17 0.2× 45 1.5× 50 1.7× 24 301
Peter Siegel United States 11 81 0.4× 42 0.4× 18 0.2× 24 0.8× 16 0.6× 25 399
Reginald P. Baker Netherlands 3 108 0.5× 32 0.3× 15 0.2× 31 1.0× 2 0.1× 3 212
Jill H. Lohmeier United States 7 44 0.2× 14 0.1× 152 1.9× 53 1.8× 32 1.1× 18 409

Countries citing papers authored by Annemieke Luiten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annemieke Luiten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annemieke Luiten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annemieke Luiten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annemieke Luiten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annemieke Luiten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annemieke Luiten. The network helps show where Annemieke Luiten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annemieke Luiten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annemieke Luiten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annemieke Luiten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annemieke Luiten. Annemieke Luiten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Schouten, Barry, Peter Lugtig, & Annemieke Luiten. (2025). Can Smart Surveys Have a Positive Business Case? An Evaluation Based on Three Case Studies. Journal of Official Statistics. 41(2). 547–568.
2.
Luiten, Annemieke, et al.. (2024). Data donation of personal physical activity trackers. Survey Practice. 17(1). 1–25. 1 indexed citations
3.
Luiten, Annemieke, et al.. (2024). Comparing national device-based physical activity surveillance systems: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 21(1). 67–67. 6 indexed citations
4.
Lugtig, Peter & Annemieke Luiten. (2021). Do shorter stated survey length and inclusion of a QR code in an invitation letter lead to better response rates?. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 7 indexed citations
5.
Schouten, Barry, et al.. (2021). Mixed-Mode Official Surveys. 3 indexed citations
6.
Toepoel, Vera, et al.. (2021). Response, Willingness, and Data Donation in a Study on Accelerometer Possession in the General Population. Survey Practice. 14(1). 1–19. 2 indexed citations
7.
Schouten, Barry, et al.. (2021). Mixed-Mode Official Surveys: Design and Analysis. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations
8.
Leeuw, Edith D. de, Annemieke Luiten, & Ineke Stoop. (2020). Preface. Journal of Official Statistics. 36(3). 463–468.
9.
Struminskaya, Bella, Vera Toepoel, Peter Lugtig, et al.. (2020). Understanding Willingness to Share Smartphone-Sensor Data. Public Opinion Quarterly. 84(3). 725–759. 41 indexed citations
10.
Luiten, Annemieke, Joop J. Hox, & Edith D. de Leeuw. (2020). Survey Nonresponse Trends and Fieldwork Effort in the 21st Century: Results of an International Study across Countries and Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics. 36(3). 469–487. 61 indexed citations
11.
Schouten, Barry, et al.. (2013). Optimizing quality of response through adaptive survey designs. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 39(1). 29–58. 56 indexed citations
12.
Schouten, Barry, Jelke Bethlehem, Koen Beullens, et al.. (2012). Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response Through R‐Indicators and Partial R‐Indicators. International Statistical Review. 80(3). 382–399. 42 indexed citations
13.
Luiten, Annemieke & Barry Schouten. (2012). Tailored Fieldwork Design to Increase Representative Household Survey Response: An Experiment in the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society). 176(1). 169–189. 47 indexed citations
14.
Luiten, Annemieke. (2010). Personalisation in advance letters does not always increase response rates. Demographic correlates in a large scale experiment. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
15.
Olthof, Tjeert, Tamara J. Ferguson, & Annemieke Luiten. (1989). Personal Responsibility Antecedents of Anger and Blame Reactions in Children. Child Development. 60(6). 1328–1328. 7 indexed citations
16.
Olthof, Tjeert, Tamara J. Ferguson, & Annemieke Luiten. (1989). Personal Responsibility Antecedents of Anger and Blame Reactions in Children. Child Development. 60(6). 1328–1336. 9 indexed citations
17.
Ferguson, Tamara J., Tjeert Olthof, Annemieke Luiten, & Brendan Gail Rule. (1984). Children's Use of Observed Behavioral Frequency versus Behavioral Covariation in Ascribing Dispositions to Others. Child Development. 55(6). 2094–2094. 13 indexed citations
18.
Ferguson, Tamara J., Tjeert Olthof, Annemieke Luiten, & Brendan Gail Rule. (1984). Children's Use of Observed Behavioral Frequency versus Behavioral Covariation in Ascribing Dispositions to Others. Child Development. 55(6). 2094–2105. 20 indexed citations
19.
Go, K.G., et al.. (1982). First experiences with proton spin tomography (NMR). Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 84(2). 81–90. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026