Pim van Dijk

7.3k total citations
181 papers, 4.6k citations indexed

About

Pim van Dijk is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Pim van Dijk has authored 181 papers receiving a total of 4.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 117 papers in Sensory Systems, 106 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 55 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Pim van Dijk's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (116 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (92 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (55 papers). Pim van Dijk is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (116 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (92 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (55 papers). Pim van Dijk collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Pim van Dijk's co-authors include Emile de Kleine, Dave R.M. Langers, Hero P. Wit, Cris Lanting, Walter H. Backes, Elouise A. Koops, Alberto Recio‐Spinoso, Mario A. Ruggero, Andrei N. Temchin and Marlies Knipper and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Pim van Dijk

175 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pim van Dijk Netherlands 36 3.0k 3.0k 1.5k 523 506 181 4.6k
Robert V. Harrison Canada 36 2.2k 0.7× 2.0k 0.7× 629 0.4× 481 0.9× 207 0.4× 146 4.4k
David McAlpine United Kingdom 34 4.5k 1.5× 2.9k 1.0× 639 0.4× 851 1.6× 95 0.2× 117 5.4k
Alan R. Palmer United Kingdom 48 6.6k 2.2× 3.8k 1.3× 644 0.4× 893 1.7× 298 0.6× 187 7.8k
Jennifer R. Melcher United States 32 3.6k 1.2× 1.8k 0.6× 976 0.7× 334 0.6× 390 0.8× 51 4.4k
Haim Sohmer Israel 35 2.4k 0.8× 2.2k 0.7× 1.0k 0.7× 386 0.7× 103 0.2× 220 4.7k
Frank E. Musiek United States 39 4.3k 1.4× 2.2k 0.7× 549 0.4× 1.1k 2.1× 146 0.3× 179 5.4k
R. Klinke Germany 38 3.4k 1.1× 3.2k 1.1× 798 0.5× 526 1.0× 49 0.1× 117 5.0k
Patricia A. Leake United States 33 2.5k 0.8× 2.5k 0.8× 331 0.2× 513 1.0× 68 0.1× 55 3.4k
Hero P. Wit Netherlands 31 1.3k 0.4× 1.8k 0.6× 1.2k 0.8× 471 0.9× 45 0.1× 153 2.9k
J. J. Eggermont Netherlands 36 2.9k 1.0× 1.9k 0.6× 732 0.5× 435 0.8× 38 0.1× 74 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Pim van Dijk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pim van Dijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pim van Dijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pim van Dijk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pim van Dijk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pim van Dijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pim van Dijk. The network helps show where Pim van Dijk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pim van Dijk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pim van Dijk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pim van Dijk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pim van Dijk. Pim van Dijk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bergevin, Christopher, et al.. (2025). Auditory cellular cooperativity probed via spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Biophysical Journal. 124(8). 1208–1225.
2.
Girolamo, Laura de, Elizabeth A. Arendt, Mette Renate Andersen, et al.. (2025). Sustaining momentum in gender equity: Lessons from the women in European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy initiative. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 33(12). 4487–4490.
3.
Aalbers, Marlien W., et al.. (2024). Cross-sectional screening for inflammation in tinnitus with near-normal hearing. Hearing Research. 453. 109124–109124. 3 indexed citations
4.
Koops, Elouise A., et al.. (2023). Hyperacusis is associated with smaller gray matter volumes in the supplementary motor area. NeuroImage Clinical. 38. 103425–103425. 3 indexed citations
5.
Dijk, Pim van & G.J.H. van Hoof. (2022). Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. 5 indexed citations
6.
Arnold, Rosemarie, et al.. (2021). Validation of a Dutch version of the Tinnitus Functional Index in a tertiary referral tinnitus clinic. Heliyon. 7(8). e07733–e07733. 3 indexed citations
7.
Koops, Elouise A. & Pim van Dijk. (2020). Hyperacusis in tinnitus patients relates to enlarged subcortical and cortical responses to sound except at the tinnitus frequency. Hearing Research. 401. 108158–108158. 25 indexed citations
8.
Dijk, J. Marc C. van, et al.. (2019). An auditory brainstem implant for treatment of unilateral tinnitus: protocol for an interventional pilot study. BMJ Open. 9(6). e026185–e026185. 4 indexed citations
9.
Free, Rolien H., et al.. (2018). A Prospective Study of the Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus. Audiology and Neurotology. 23(6). 356–363. 15 indexed citations
10.
Gravel, Nicolás, et al.. (2015). Connective field mapping in a hemispherectomized patient. Perception. 44. 369–370. 1 indexed citations
11.
Dijk, Pim van & Geoffrey A. Manley. (2013). The Effects of Air Pressure on Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions of Lizards. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 14(3). 309–319. 6 indexed citations
12.
Knipper, Marlies, et al.. (2013). Advances in the neurobiology of hearing disorders: Recent developments regarding the basis of tinnitus and hyperacusis. Progress in Neurobiology. 111. 17–33. 225 indexed citations
13.
Dijk, Pim van, Bert Maat, & Emile de Kleine. (2010). The Effect of Static Ear Canal Pressure on Human Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions: Spectral Width as a Measure of the Intra-cochlear Oscillation Amplitude. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 12(1). 13–28. 13 indexed citations
14.
Segenhout, J. M., et al.. (2008). Mechanics of the exceptional anuran ear. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 194(5). 417–428. 16 indexed citations
15.
Meenderink, Sebastiaan W. F. & Pim van Dijk. (2004). Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens. Hearing Research. 192(1-2). 107–118. 19 indexed citations
16.
Lewis, Edwin R. & Pim van Dijk. (2004). New variations on the derivation of spectro-temporal receptive fields for primary auditory afferent axons. Hearing Research. 189(1-2). 120–136. 16 indexed citations
17.
Wuijckhuise, L. van, et al.. (2002). [Botulism poisoning in cattle, a case report, diagnosis and prevention].. PubMed. 127(13). 422–4. 1 indexed citations
18.
Dijk, Pim van, Hero P. Wit, & J. M. Segenhout. (1997). Dissecting the frog inner ear with Gaussian noise. II. Temperature dependence of inner ear function. Hearing Research. 114(1-2). 243–251. 12 indexed citations
19.
Wit, Hero P., Pim van Dijk, & Paul Avan. (1994). On the shape of (evoked) otoacoustic emission spectra. Hearing Research. 81(1-2). 208–214. 10 indexed citations
20.
Dijk, Pim van, Hero P. Wit, & J. M. Segenhout. (1989). Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the European edible frog (Rana esculenta): Spectral details and temperature dependence. Hearing Research. 42(2-3). 273–282. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026