Annemarie Kalis
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Denny BorsboomAngélique O. J. CramerStefan KaiserAndreas MojzischPhilippe N. ToblerTanja Sophie SchweizerJohannes J. M. van DeldenMaartje Schermer
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers)
- Journals
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesJournal of Abnormal PsychologyBehavioral and Brain Sciences
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Annemarie Kalis
29 papers receiving 572 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 259
- Cognitive Neuroscience 255
- Psychiatry and Mental health 120
- Philosophy 107
- Clinical Psychology 98
Countries citing papers authored by Annemarie Kalis
This map shows the geographic impact of Annemarie Kalis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annemarie Kalis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annemarie Kalis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annemarie Kalis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annemarie Kalis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annemarie Kalis. The network helps show where Annemarie Kalis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annemarie Kalis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annemarie Kalis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annemarie Kalis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annemarie Kalis. Annemarie Kalis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 269 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | Ethical questions in the field of pharmacogenetics | 2 |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | Indirect bright light therapy decreases sleep fragmentation in institutionalized demented elderly | 4 |
About Annemarie Kalis
Annemarie Kalis is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and General Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (43 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (259 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (43 citations). Annemarie Kalis has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Denny Borsboom, Angélique O. J. Cramer, Stefan Kaiser, Andreas Mojzisch, Philippe N. Tobler, Tanja Sophie Schweizer, Johannes J. M. van Delden, Maartje Schermer, Bart A. Kamphorst and Gerben Meynen. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.