Stephanie Mehl
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tania M. LincolnWinfried RiefMichael ZieglerMarie-Luise KestingDirk WernerEva LüllmannLea LudwigSteffen Moritz
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (34 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (22 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (14 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyJournal of Abnormal PsychologySchizophrenia Bulletin
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Stephanie Mehl
46 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Psychiatry and Mental health 810
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 467
- Philosophy 409
- Clinical Psychology 374
- Cognitive Neuroscience 191
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Mehl
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Mehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Mehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Mehl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Mehl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Mehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Mehl. The network helps show where Stephanie Mehl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Mehl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Mehl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Mehl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Mehl. Stephanie Mehl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 68 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 66 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 89 | |
| 18 | 57 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Stephanie Mehl
Stephanie Mehl is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (34 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (22 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (810 citations), Philosophy (409 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (467 citations). Stephanie Mehl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Tania M. Lincoln, Winfried Rief, Michael Ziegler, Marie-Luise Kesting, Dirk Werner, Eva Lüllmann, Lea Ludwig, Steffen Moritz, H. Leon Bradlow and George Y. Wong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.