Anne Schlottmann

1.7k total citations
40 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Anne Schlottmann is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and General Decision Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Schlottmann has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 11 papers in Statistics and Probability and 10 papers in General Decision Sciences. Recurrent topics in Anne Schlottmann's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (29 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (9 papers). Anne Schlottmann is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (29 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (9 papers). Anne Schlottmann collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Anne Schlottmann's co-authors include Norman H. Anderson, Elizabeth Ray, Luca Surian, David R. Shanks, Andrew Tolmie, Sarah Bayless, David A. Lagnado, Friedrich Wilkening, Oshin Vartanian and Mandeep K. Dhami and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Child Development.

In The Last Decade

Anne Schlottmann

39 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne Schlottmann United Kingdom 20 700 493 408 221 214 40 1.2k
Julian Jara‐Ettinger United States 17 747 1.1× 458 0.9× 427 1.0× 310 1.4× 114 0.5× 84 1.5k
Frédéric Vallée‐Tourangeau United Kingdom 19 326 0.5× 423 0.9× 207 0.5× 308 1.4× 159 0.7× 83 1.0k
Alejandro López Mexico 7 615 0.9× 175 0.4× 242 0.6× 218 1.0× 163 0.8× 21 1.0k
Ainat Pansky Israel 12 298 0.4× 730 1.5× 289 0.7× 259 1.2× 47 0.2× 23 1.1k
Jean‐Baptiste Van der Henst France 20 360 0.5× 466 0.9× 346 0.8× 314 1.4× 87 0.4× 53 1.1k
Bahador Bahrami United Kingdom 15 161 0.2× 610 1.2× 242 0.6× 250 1.1× 70 0.3× 35 1.1k
Monica Bucciarelli Italy 19 541 0.8× 433 0.9× 305 0.7× 364 1.6× 94 0.4× 69 1.2k
Stephanie Denison Canada 15 621 0.9× 178 0.4× 123 0.3× 86 0.4× 119 0.6× 53 910
Jerwen Jou United States 16 145 0.2× 446 0.9× 141 0.3× 214 1.0× 96 0.4× 54 692
Bridgid Finn United States 22 878 1.3× 875 1.8× 213 0.5× 571 2.6× 59 0.3× 47 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Schlottmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Schlottmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Schlottmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Schlottmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Schlottmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Schlottmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Schlottmann. The network helps show where Anne Schlottmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Schlottmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Schlottmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Schlottmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Schlottmann. Anne Schlottmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tolmie, Andrew, et al.. (2020). The role of spatial and spatial-temporal analysis in children’s causal cognition of continuous processes. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0235884–e0235884. 5 indexed citations
2.
Tolmie, Andrew, et al.. (2019). Children's reasoning about continuous causal processes: The role of verbal and non‐verbal ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 90(2). 364–381. 13 indexed citations
3.
Bechlivanidis, Christos, Anne Schlottmann, & David A. Lagnado. (2019). Causation without realism.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 148(5). 785–804. 8 indexed citations
4.
Gerstenberg, Tobias, et al.. (2018). What’s fair? How children assign reward to members of teams with differing causal structures. Cognition. 177. 234–248. 8 indexed citations
5.
Ellefson, Michelle R., et al.. (2013). Using Property induction to evaluate understanding of mixing. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 1 indexed citations
6.
Schlottmann, Anne, et al.. (2013). Domain-specific perceptual causality in children depends on the spatio-temporal configuration, not motion onset. Frontiers in Psychology. 4. 365–365. 9 indexed citations
7.
Schlottmann, Anne, et al.. (2012). Averaging and Adding in Children's Worth Judgements. UCL Discovery (University College London). 33(3). 495–513. 2 indexed citations
8.
Schlottmann, Anne, Elizabeth Ray, & Luca Surian. (2012). Emerging perception of causality in action-and-reaction sequences from 4 to 6months of age: Is it domain-specific?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 112(2). 208–230. 19 indexed citations
9.
Schlottmann, Anne & Friedrich Wilkening. (2011). Judgement and Decision Making in Young Children: Probability, Expected Value, Belief Updating, Heuristics and Biases.. 6 indexed citations
10.
Bayless, Sarah & Anne Schlottmann. (2010). Skill-Related Uncertainty and Expected Value in 5- to 7-Year-Olds. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9 indexed citations
11.
Schlottmann, Anne & Elizabeth Ray. (2009). Goal attribution to schematic animals: do 6‐month‐olds perceive biological motion as animate?. Developmental Science. 13(1). 1–10. 60 indexed citations
12.
Schlottmann, Anne, et al.. (2009). Unimpaired Perception of Social and Physical Causality, but Impaired Perception of Animacy in High Functioning Children with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 40(1). 39–53. 26 indexed citations
13.
Schlottmann, Anne, Luca Surian, & Elizabeth Ray. (2008). Causal perception of action-and-reaction sequences in 8- to 10-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 103(1). 87–107. 28 indexed citations
14.
Schlottmann, Anne & Norman H. Anderson. (2007). Belief learning and revision studied with information integration theory. UCL Discovery (University College London). 3 indexed citations
15.
Schlottmann, Anne, et al.. (2006). Perceived physical and social causality in animated motions: Spontaneous reports and ratings. Acta Psychologica. 123(1-2). 112–143. 71 indexed citations
16.
Schlottmann, Anne, et al.. (2002). Perceptual Causality in Children. Child Development. 73(6). 1656–1677. 48 indexed citations
17.
Schlottmann, Anne. (2001). Children's Probability Intuitions: Understanding the Expected Value of Complex Gambles. Child Development. 72(1). 103–122. 108 indexed citations
18.
Schlottmann, Anne. (1999). Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: How children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism.. Developmental Psychology. 35(1). 303–317. 78 indexed citations
19.
Schlottmann, Anne & Norman H. Anderson. (1995). Belief revision in children: Serial judgment in social cognition and decision-making domains.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 21(5). 1349–1364. 19 indexed citations
20.
Schlottmann, Anne & Norman H. Anderson. (1993). An information integration approach to phenomenal causality. Memory & Cognition. 21(6). 785–801. 94 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026