Annabeth L. Propst

21 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

The New Economics: For Industry, Government, Education19962026200620161996250500750

Peers

Annabeth L. Propst
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Management Information Systems 280
  • Strategy and Management 232
  • Management Science and Operations Research 173
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 161
  • General Health Professions 139
Replace David L. Goetsch with:
David L. Goetsch United States
Howard S. Gitlow United States
Bo Bergman Sweden
Ravi S. Behara United States
Robert L. Nydick United States
Kristina Lauche Netherlands
Kevin Neailey United Kingdom
Jiunn-I Shieh Taiwan
Mattias Elg Sweden
Ken Black United States
Annabeth L. Propst relative to David L. Goetsch United States David L. Goetsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
David L. Goetsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annabeth L. Propst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annabeth L. Propst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabeth L. Propst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabeth L. Propst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annabeth L. Propst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabeth L. Propst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabeth L. Propst. The network helps show where Annabeth L. Propst may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annabeth L. Propst

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annabeth L. Propst. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annabeth L. Propst based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annabeth L. Propst. Annabeth L. Propst is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2
The New Economics: For Industry, Government, Educationbreakdown →
864
3
ENSURING SUCCESS: A MODEL FOR SELF-MANAGED TEAMS
1
4 5
5 1
6 2
7 6
8 130
9
COACHING PROCESS IMPROVEMENT TEAMS
1
10 6
11 5
12 1
13 30
14 10
15 18
16 20
17 1
18 4
19 1
20 2

About Annabeth L. Propst

Annabeth L. Propst is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Management Science and Operations Research and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (2 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (1 paper) and Quality and Management Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (280 citations), Strategy and Management (232 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (161 citations). Annabeth L. Propst has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include W. Edwards Deming, John A. Cornell, Douglas C. Crocker, David Anderson, Dennis J. Sweeney, Thomas A. Williams, Donald J. Wheeler, Lincoln E. Moses, David S. Moore and Richard P. Copp. Their work appears in journals such as Technometrics, Journal of Quality Technology and Quality Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026