Kate Douglas

673 citations
58 papers · 275 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Kate Douglas

50 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Kate Douglas
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Literature and Literary Theory 75
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 20
  • Gender Studies 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 109
  • Speech and Hearing 17
Replace Jeanette Winterson with:
Jeanette Winterson
Ilán Stavans United States
Alice J. Pitt Canada
Maya Angelou Finland
Julie Rak Canada
Patricia Sawin United States
Susan Sellers France
Maxine Hong Kingston Canada
Maria Tatar United States
Margaretta Jolly United Kingdom
Kate Douglas relative to Jeanette Winterson Jeanette Winterson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Jeanette Winterson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Douglas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Douglas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Douglas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Douglas. The network helps show where Kate Douglas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Kate Douglas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Douglas Line = papers co-authored together Kate Douglas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201042
2 201526
3 201616
4 201614
5 201913
6 201713
7 201611
8 201610
9 20019
10 20149
11 20187
12 20146
13 20186
14 20156
15 20176
16 20216
17
Translating Trauma: Witnessing Bom Bali
20085
18 20165
19
‘Stories’ : Social Media and Ephemeral Narratives as Memoir
20173
20 20123

About Kate Douglas

Kate Douglas is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Speech and Hearing and Philosophy, having authored 58 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (7 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (5 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (5 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (4 papers), South African History and Culture (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (3 papers) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (75 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (20 citations), Gender Studies (36 citations), Sociology and Political Science (109 citations) and Speech and Hearing (17 citations). Kate Douglas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anna Poletti, Rosanne Kennedy, Laurie S. McNeill, Gillian Whitlock, John K. Wu, Rebecca Ronsley, Natalie Edwards, Jeffrey Davis, Rebecca Deyell and Helen Nadel. Their work appears in journals such as Life Writing, a/b Auto/Biography Studies, Biography, Textual Practice and Higher Education Research & Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact