Anna O. Graeber

1.1k total citations
27 papers, 685 citations indexed

About

Anna O. Graeber is a scholar working on Education, Statistics and Probability and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna O. Graeber has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 685 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Education, 9 papers in Statistics and Probability and 4 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Anna O. Graeber's work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (16 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (9 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (6 papers). Anna O. Graeber is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (16 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (9 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (6 papers). Anna O. Graeber collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. Anna O. Graeber's co-authors include Dina Tirosh, J. Randy McGinnis, Carolyn Parker, Thomas R. Post, Kathleen Cramer, Amy Roth McDuffie, Steven L. Kramer, Patricia F. Campbell, Kristie J. Newton and Marilyn J. Chambliss and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education and Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

In The Last Decade

Anna O. Graeber

26 papers receiving 565 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna O. Graeber United States	14	636	346	121	80	55	27	685
F. Joe Crosswhite United States	7	519 0.8×	180 0.5×	72 0.6×	30 0.4×	24 0.4×	21	599
Laura R. Van Zoest United States	16	689 1.1×	237 0.7×	135 1.1×	69 0.9×	16 0.3×	42	726
Judith T. Sowder United States	16	783 1.2×	657 1.9×	183 1.5×	130 1.6×	12 0.2×	28	894
Karen F. Thomas United States	7	509 0.8×	163 0.5×	155 1.3×	26 0.3×	15 0.3×	12	595
Irene Bloom United States	3	535 0.8×	105 0.3×	179 1.5×	32 0.4×	52 0.9×	4	611
Tad Watanabe United States	12	444 0.7×	222 0.6×	89 0.7×	43 0.5×	23 0.4×	38	490
Marilyn N. Suydam United States	12	325 0.5×	155 0.4×	95 0.8×	23 0.3×	41 0.7×	64	462
Alistair McIntosh Australia	11	607 1.0×	427 1.2×	141 1.2×	130 1.6×	10 0.2×	27	682
Kathleen Cramer United States	15	724 1.1×	462 1.3×	182 1.5×	109 1.4×	10 0.2×	39	786
Thomasenia Lott Adams United States	12	391 0.6×	98 0.3×	85 0.7×	39 0.5×	23 0.4×	35	475

Countries citing papers authored by Anna O. Graeber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna O. Graeber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna O. Graeber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna O. Graeber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna O. Graeber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna O. Graeber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna O. Graeber. The network helps show where Anna O. Graeber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna O. Graeber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna O. Graeber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna O. Graeber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna O. Graeber. Anna O. Graeber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Graeber, Anna O., Kristie J. Newton, & Marilyn J. Chambliss. (2012). Crossing the Borders Again: Challenges in Comparing Quality Instruction in Mathematics and Reading. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 114(4). 1–30. 15 indexed citations

2.

McGinnis, J. Randy, Amy Roth McDuffie, & Anna O. Graeber. (2006). Perceptions of making connections between science and mathematics in a science methods course. 18(2). 13–29. 5 indexed citations

3.

McGinnis, J. Randy, Carolyn Parker, & Anna O. Graeber. (2004). A cultural perspective of the induction of five reform‐minded beginning mathematics and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(7). 720–747. 64 indexed citations

4.

McGinnis, J. Randy, et al.. (2002). Undergraduates' attitudes and beliefs about subject matter and pedagogy measured periodically in a reform‐based mathematics and science teacher preparation program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39(8). 713–737. 43 indexed citations

5.

McGinnis, J. Randy, Carolyn Parker, & Anna O. Graeber. (2000). An Examination of the Enculturation of Five Reform-Prepared New Specialist Teachers of Mathematics and Science.. 2 indexed citations

6.

Ferrini‐Mundy, Joan, et al.. (1994). Connecting Research to Teaching: Learning about Calculus Learning. Mathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12. 87(2). 115–121. 8 indexed citations

7.

Fernández, María Lameiras, et al.. (1994). Connecting Research to Teaching: Problem Solving: Managing It All. Mathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12. 87(3). 195–199. 12 indexed citations

8.

Graeber, Anna O. & Patricia F. Campbell. (1993). Research Into Practice: Misconceptions about Multiplication and Division. The Arithmetic Teacher. 40(7). 408–411. 12 indexed citations

9.

Graeber, Anna O., et al.. (1992). Little into Big Is the Way It Always Is. The Arithmetic Teacher. 39(8). 18–21. 3 indexed citations

10.

Graeber, Anna O., et al.. (1991). Curriculum Materials and Misconceptions Concerning Multiplication and Division.. Focus on learning problems in mathematics. 13(3). 25–38. 5 indexed citations

11.

Tirosh, Dina, et al.. (1991). Computer-based intervention to correct preservice teachers' misconceptions about the operation of division. 10(2). 71–78. 6 indexed citations

12.

Tirosh, Dina & Anna O. Graeber. (1991). The Effect of Problem Type and Common Misconceptions on Preservice Elementary Teachers' Thinking About Division. School Science and Mathematics. 91(4). 157–163. 21 indexed citations

13.

Tirosh, Dina & Anna O. Graeber. (1990). Inconsistencies in Preservice Elementary Teachers' Beliefs about Multiplication and Division.. Focus on learning problems in mathematics. 12. 65–74. 18 indexed citations

14.

Tirosh, Dina & Anna O. Graeber. (1990). Evoking Cognitive Conflict to Explore Preservice Teachers' Thinking about Division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 21(2). 98–98. 43 indexed citations

15.

Tirosh, Dina & Anna O. Graeber. (1990). Evoking Cognitive Conflict to Explore Preservice Teachers' Thinking about Division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 21(2). 98–108. 56 indexed citations

16.

Graeber, Anna O. & Dina Tirosh. (1990). Insights fourth and fifth graders bring to multiplication and division with decimals. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 21(6). 565–588. 28 indexed citations

17.

Graeber, Anna O., et al.. (1989). Preservice Teachers' Misconceptions in Solving Verbal Problems in Multiplication and Division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 20(1). 95–95. 100 indexed citations

18.

Graeber, Anna O., et al.. (1982). Time Spent in Learning: Implications from Research. The Elementary School Journal. 82(5). 471–480. 41 indexed citations

19.

Graeber, Anna O.. (1980). A Basic Skills Instructional Improvement Program: Utilizing Research to Facilitate Implementation and Dissemination.. 1 indexed citations

20.

Graeber, Anna O. & Lisa Wallace. (1977). Identification of Systematic Errors: Final Report.. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact