Cecilia E. Ford

5.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
33 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Cecilia E. Ford is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cecilia E. Ford has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Language and Linguistics, 8 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Cecilia E. Ford's work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (15 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (8 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers). Cecilia E. Ford is often cited by papers focused on Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (15 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (8 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers). Cecilia E. Ford collaborates with scholars based in United States. Cecilia E. Ford's co-authors include Elizabeth Couper‐Kuhlen, Molly Carnes, Anna Kaatz, Sandra A. Thompson, Jennifer Sheridan, Carol Isaac, Linda Baier Manwell, Patricia G. Devine, Wairimu Magua and Angela Byars‐Winston and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Academic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Cecilia E. Ford

33 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Ha... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cecilia E. Ford United States 17 695 458 304 266 191 33 1.3k
Ellen Barton United States 18 564 0.8× 282 0.6× 443 1.5× 35 0.1× 182 1.0× 66 1.3k
Stephanie Schnurr United Kingdom 20 478 0.7× 230 0.5× 373 1.2× 196 0.7× 44 0.2× 59 1.1k
Kristine L. Fitch United States 14 420 0.6× 152 0.3× 241 0.8× 45 0.2× 26 0.1× 32 930
Svenja Adolphs United Kingdom 17 587 0.8× 190 0.4× 334 1.1× 21 0.1× 36 0.2× 54 1.1k
Wyke Stommel Netherlands 14 336 0.5× 56 0.1× 182 0.6× 58 0.2× 63 0.3× 53 759
Douglas Macbeth United States 13 550 0.8× 199 0.4× 274 0.9× 36 0.1× 14 0.1× 22 1.1k
Nigel Mantou Lou Canada 23 570 0.8× 649 1.4× 296 1.0× 43 0.2× 16 0.1× 61 1.8k
Gerry Philipsen United States 13 349 0.5× 136 0.3× 287 0.9× 51 0.2× 18 0.1× 24 864
Warwick B. Elley New Zealand 16 659 0.9× 142 0.3× 417 1.4× 32 0.1× 31 0.2× 43 2.1k
Dennis Kurzon Israel 14 688 1.0× 220 0.5× 311 1.0× 28 0.1× 7 0.0× 55 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Cecilia E. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecilia E. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecilia E. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecilia E. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecilia E. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecilia E. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecilia E. Ford. The network helps show where Cecilia E. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cecilia E. Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cecilia E. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cecilia E. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cecilia E. Ford. Cecilia E. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Raymond, Chase Wesley, et al.. (2021). The Grammar of Obviousness: The Palm-Up Gesture in Argument Sequences. Frontiers in Communication. 6. 11 indexed citations
2.
Pier, Elizabeth L., Joshua Raclaw, Molly Carnes, Cecilia E. Ford, & Anna Kaatz. (2019). Laughter and the Chair: Social Pressures Influencing Scoring During Grant Peer Review Meetings. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(4). 513–514. 4 indexed citations
3.
Pier, Elizabeth L., Markus Bräuer, Amarette Filut, et al.. (2018). Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(12). 2952–2957. 99 indexed citations
4.
Raclaw, Joshua & Cecilia E. Ford. (2017). Laughter and the management of divergent positions in peer review interactions. Journal of Pragmatics. 113. 1–15. 16 indexed citations
5.
Pier, Elizabeth L., Joshua Raclaw, Anna Kaatz, et al.. (2016). ‘Your comments are meaner than your score’: score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review. Research Evaluation. 26(1). 1–14. 36 indexed citations
6.
Isaac, Carol, Linda Baier Manwell, Patricia G. Devine, et al.. (2016). Difficult Dialogues: Faculty Responses to a Gender Bias Literacy Training Program. The Qualitative Report. 21(7). 1243–1265. 15 indexed citations
7.
Pier, Elizabeth L., Joshua Raclaw, Mitchell J. Nathan, et al.. (2015). Studying the Study Section: How Group Decision Making in Person and via Videoconferencing Affects the Grant Peer Review Process. WCER Working Paper No. 2015-6.. 3 indexed citations
8.
Carnes, Molly, Patricia G. Devine, Linda Baier Manwell, et al.. (2014). The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution. Academic Medicine. 90(2). 221–230. 352 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Ford, Cecilia E., et al.. (2012). Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation. Discourse Processes. 49(3-4). 192–212. 44 indexed citations
10.
Ford, Cecilia E.. (2012). Clarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysis. Discourse Studies. 14(4). 507–513. 13 indexed citations
11.
Ford, Cecilia E.. (2008). Women speaking up : getting and using turns in workplace meetings. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks. 57 indexed citations
12.
Ford, Cecilia E.. (2004). Contingency and Units in Interaction. Discourse Studies. 6(1). 27–52. 80 indexed citations
13.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, & John Hellermann. (2004). "Getting Past No" : Sequence, Action and Sound Production in the Projection of No-Initiated Turns. 10 indexed citations
14.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, & John Hellermann. (2004). Getting past no. 233–269. 2 indexed citations
15.
Ford, Cecilia E.. (2002). Denial and the construction of conversational turns. John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks. 61–78. 18 indexed citations
16.
Ford, Cecilia E.. (2001). At the intersection of turn and sequence. 51. 1 indexed citations
17.
Ford, Cecilia E.. (1999). Collaborative Construction of Task Activity: Coordinating Multiple Resources in a High School Physics Lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 32(4). 369–408. 46 indexed citations
18.
Ford, Cecilia E. & Barbara A. Fox. (1996). Interactional Motivations for Reference Formulation. 145. 2 indexed citations
19.
Ford, Cecilia E.. (1994). Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. 14(4). 32 indexed citations
20.
Ford, Cecilia E.. (1993). Grammar in Interaction. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026