Anna Hošťálková
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Berberine and alkaloids research
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
Papers in
-
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 23
- Pharmacology 20
- Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology 18
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases 15
- Berberine and alkaloids research 8
- Plant-based Medicinal Research 4
- Co-authors
- Lucie Cahlíková (34 shared papers)Lubomı́r Opletal (24 shared papers)Jakub Chlebek (19 shared papers)Marcela Šafratová (17 shared papers)Jiřı́ Kuneš (15 shared papers)Daniela Hulcová (13 shared papers)Daniel Jun (8 shared papers)Lucie Nováková (8 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Anna Hošťálková
38 papers receiving 727 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Pharmacology 317
- Pharmacology 345
- Organic Chemistry 414
- Complementary and alternative medicine 54
- Clinical Psychology 117
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Hošťálková
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Hošťálková's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Hošťálková with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Hošťálková more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Hošťálková
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Hošťálková. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Hošťálková. The network helps show where Anna Hošťálková may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Hošťálková, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 18 |
About Anna Hošťálková
Anna Hošťálková is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and Biochemistry, having authored 38 papers that have together received 742 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (23 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (18 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (15 papers), Berberine and alkaloids research (8 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (7 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (5 papers), Synthesis and Biological Activity (4 papers) and Plant-based Medicinal Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (317 citations), Pharmacology (345 citations), Organic Chemistry (414 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (54 citations) and Clinical Psychology (117 citations). Anna Hošťálková has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Spain and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lucie Cahlíková, Lubomı́r Opletal, Jakub Chlebek, Marcela Šafratová, Jiřı́ Kuneš, Daniela Hulcová, Daniel Jun, Lucie Nováková, Vincenza Andrisano and Kateřina Macáková. Their work appears in journals such as Natural Product Communications, Molecules, Journal of Natural Products, Phytochemistry and Fitoterapia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.