Anna Horleston

2.8k total citations
25 papers, 236 citations indexed

About

Anna Horleston is a scholar working on Geophysics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Horleston has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 236 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Geophysics, 15 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Anna Horleston's work include Planetary Science and Exploration (14 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (8 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (7 papers). Anna Horleston is often cited by papers focused on Planetary Science and Exploration (14 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (8 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (7 papers). Anna Horleston collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Anna Horleston's co-authors include Constantinos Charalambous, W. B. Banerdt, Philippe Lognonné, George Helffrich, Taïchi Kawamura, John Clinton, Simon C. Stähler, Savas Ceylan, Domenico Giardini and F. Euchner and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Earth and Planetary Science Letters and Geophysical Research Letters.

In The Last Decade

Anna Horleston

24 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Horleston United Kingdom 9 149 135 27 22 13 25 236
Beverley Elliott Canada 5 41 0.3× 90 0.7× 15 0.6× 29 1.3× 11 0.8× 10 138
N. Toksöz United States 8 234 1.6× 214 1.6× 17 0.6× 37 1.7× 7 0.5× 11 343
Angela G. Marusiak United States 8 131 0.9× 226 1.7× 26 1.0× 40 1.8× 5 0.4× 31 293
É. Beucler France 13 531 3.6× 70 0.5× 34 1.3× 30 1.4× 8 0.6× 31 592
Iris van Zelst Germany 9 239 1.6× 29 0.2× 19 0.7× 28 1.3× 9 0.7× 21 280
Nicolas Brachet France 7 379 2.5× 71 0.5× 80 3.0× 41 1.9× 8 0.6× 8 412
P. Herry France 5 295 2.0× 58 0.4× 67 2.5× 37 1.7× 11 0.8× 5 331
Nicolas Compaire United States 8 135 0.9× 111 0.8× 23 0.9× 26 1.2× 1 0.1× 9 193
Μαρίνα Γεωργίου Greece 13 183 1.2× 289 2.1× 6 0.2× 13 0.6× 3 0.2× 23 387

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Horleston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Horleston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Horleston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Horleston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Horleston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Horleston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Horleston. The network helps show where Anna Horleston may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Horleston

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Horleston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Horleston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Horleston. Anna Horleston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Charalambous, Constantinos, W. T. Pike, Benjamin Fernando, et al.. (2025). New Impacts on Mars: Unraveling Seismic Propagation Paths Through a Cerberus Fossae Impact Detection. Geophysical Research Letters. 52(3). 5 indexed citations
2.
Plesa, Ana‐Catalina, Iris van Zelst, Richard Ghail, et al.. (2025). The Seismogenic Thickness of Venus. Journal of Geophysical Research Planets. 130(7). 1 indexed citations
3.
Dahmen, Nikolaj, John Clinton, Simon C. Stähler, et al.. (2024). Revisiting Martian seismicity with deep learning-based denoising. Geophysical Journal International. 239(1). 434–454. 1 indexed citations
4.
García, R., Iris van Zelst, Taïchi Kawamura, et al.. (2024). Seismic Wave Detectability on Venus Using Ground Deformation Sensors, Infrasound Sensors on Balloons and Airglow Imagers. Earth and Space Science. 11(11). 3 indexed citations
5.
Knapmeyer, Martin, Simon C. Stähler, Ana‐Catalina Plesa, et al.. (2023). The Global Seismic Moment Rate of Mars After Event S1222a. Geophysical Research Letters. 50(7). 8 indexed citations
6.
Daubar, I. J., Benjamin Fernando, R. García, et al.. (2023). Two Seismic Events from InSight Confirmed as New Impacts on Mars. The Planetary Science Journal. 4(9). 175–175. 14 indexed citations
7.
Nishida, Kiwamu, Taïchi Kawamura, Naomi Murdoch, et al.. (2023). Description of Martian Convective Vortices Observed by InSight and Implications for Vertical Vortex Structure and Subsurface Physical Properties. Journal of Geophysical Research Planets. 128(8). 3 indexed citations
8.
Li, Jiaqi, Caroline Beghein, S. M. McLennan, et al.. (2022). Constraints on the martian crust away from the InSight landing site. Nature Communications. 13(1). 7950–7950. 17 indexed citations
9.
Stott, Alexander, R. García, Aymeric Spiga, et al.. (2022). Machine learning and marsquakes: a tool to predict atmospheric-seismic noise for the NASA InSight mission. Geophysical Journal International. 233(2). 978–998. 6 indexed citations
10.
Kawamura, Taïchi, John Clinton, Géraldine Zenhäusern, et al.. (2022). S1222a—The Largest Marsquake Detected by InSight. Geophysical Research Letters. 50(5). 34 indexed citations
11.
Driel, Martin van, Savas Ceylan, John Clinton, et al.. (2021). High‐Frequency Seismic Events on Mars Observed by InSight. Journal of Geophysical Research Planets. 126(2). 35 indexed citations
12.
Böse, Maren, Simon C. Stähler, Nicholas Deichmann, et al.. (2021). Magnitude Scales for Marsquakes Calibrated from InSight Data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 111(6). 3003–3015. 26 indexed citations
13.
Stott, Alexander, Constantinos Charalambous, T. Warren, et al.. (2021). The Site Tilt and Lander Transfer Function from the Short-Period Seismometer of InSight on Mars. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 111(6). 2889–2908. 7 indexed citations
14.
Knapmeyer, Martin, Simon C. Stähler, Martin van Driel, et al.. (2020). Is there a Seasonality of the Martian Seismic Event Rate?. elib (German Aerospace Center). 1 indexed citations
15.
Stott, Alexander, Constantinos Charalambous, John McClean, et al.. (2020). Using InSight's Robotic Arm Motion to Examine the Martian Regolith's Response to Short Period Vibrations. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2082. 1 indexed citations
16.
Dahmen, Nikolaj, John Clinton, Savas Ceylan, et al.. (2020). Super High Frequency Events: A New Class of Events Recorded by the InSight Seismometers on Mars. Journal of Geophysical Research Planets. 126(2). 17 indexed citations
17.
Beghein, Caroline, M. P. Panning, M. Drilleau, et al.. (2020). Measuring Fundamental and Higher Mode Surface Wave Dispersion on Mars From Seismic Waveforms. Earth and Space Science. 8(2). 2 indexed citations
18.
Teanby, N. A., I. J. Daubar, Philippe Lognonné, et al.. (2019). Impact Detection with InSight: Updated Estimates Using Measured Seismic Noise on Mars. LPI. 1565.
19.
Clinton, John, Simon C. Stähler, Domenico Giardini, et al.. (2019). Marsquake Service for InSight: Preliminary Observations and Operations in Practice. LPI. 2915. 1 indexed citations
20.
Verdon, James P., J. M. Kendall, Anna Horleston, & A. Stork. (2016). Subsurface fluid injection and induced seismicity in southeast Saskatchewan. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 54. 429–440. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026