Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Spectral evidence for hydrated salts in recurring slope lineae on Mars
2015392 citationsL. Ojha, S. L. Murchie et al.profile →
Seasonal Flows on Warm Martian Slopes
2011354 citationsA. S. McEwen, L. Ojha et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of L. Ojha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Ojha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Ojha more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Ojha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Ojha. The network helps show where L. Ojha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Ojha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Ojha.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Ojha based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with L. Ojha. L. Ojha is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Karunatillake, S., et al.. (2020). Characterizing Martian Volcanic Provinces' Magmatic Evolution and Chemistry through Equations of State Modeling Initial Study. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2020.1 indexed citations
Ojha, L., K. W. Lewis, S. Karunatillake, & M. E. Schmidt. (2018). Global Dust from the Deflation of the Medusae Fossae Formation on Mars. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1250.1 indexed citations
11.
Ojha, L., M. Chojnacki, G. D. McDonald, et al.. (2017). Seasonal Slumps in Juventae Chasma, Mars. Journal of Geophysical Research Planets. 122(10). 2193–2214.10 indexed citations
12.
Ojha, L., et al.. (2017). Searching for Large Buried Craters on Venus. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2831.1 indexed citations
Chojnacki, M., et al.. (2015). Recurring Slope Lineae on Mars: Atmospheric Origin?. European Planetary Science Congress.9 indexed citations
15.
Ojha, L.. (2015). Spectral Evidence for Hydrated Salts in Seasonal Brine Flows on Mars. EPSC.2 indexed citations
16.
Diniega, S., A. S. McEwen, C. M. Dundas, & L. Ojha. (2014). Signs of Water? A Review of Recent Martian Slope Features. LPICo. 1791. 1423.2 indexed citations
17.
Watkins, J.G., et al.. (2014). Structurally Controlled Subsurface Fluid Flow as a Mechanism for the Formation of Recurring Slope Lineae. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2911.9 indexed citations
18.
McEwen, A. S., C. M. Dundas, S. Mattson, et al.. (2013). Recurring Slope Lineae (RSL) in Equatorial Mars. EPSC.1 indexed citations
19.
McEwen, A. S., C. M. Dundas, S. Byrne, et al.. (2012). Recurring Slope Lineae in Valles Marineris, Mars. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2012.1 indexed citations
20.
Mattson, S., et al.. (2012). Regional Digital Terrain Model Production with LROC-NAC. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2630.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.