Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Seismic Detection of the Lunar Core
2011356 citationsR. C. Weber, Pei‐Ying Patty Lin et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R. C. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. C. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. C. Weber more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. C. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. C. Weber. The network helps show where R. C. Weber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. C. Weber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. C. Weber.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. C. Weber based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. C. Weber. R. C. Weber is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Phillips, Darci J. & R. C. Weber. (2020). Determining the Shallow Surface Velocity at the Apollo 17 Landing Site. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2563.1 indexed citations
Nissen‐Meyer, Tarje, Benjamin Fernando, Kuangdai Leng, et al.. (2019). Modelling the effects of 3D shallow scatterers and atmospheric sources on Martian seismic signals at high frequencies. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2019.1 indexed citations
Gaddis, L. R., R. A. Beyer, M. K. Crombie, et al.. (2017). The NASA Planetary Data System Roadmap Study for 2017 - 2026. AGUFM. 2017.
15.
Bray, V. J., R. C. Weber, D. N. DellaGiustina, et al.. (2017). SIIOS in Alaska - Testing an `In-Vault' Option for a Europa Lander Seismometer.. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2017.1 indexed citations
16.
Watters, T. R., R. C. Weber, G. C. Collins, & C. L. Johnson. (2017). Shallow Lunar Seismic Activity and the Current Stress State of the Moon. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2569.4 indexed citations
17.
Weber, R. C., A. L. Nahm, Brian J. Yanites, & N. C. Schmerr. (2016). Mass Wasting on the Moon: Implications for Seismicity. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).2 indexed citations
18.
Watters, T. R., R. C. Weber, G. C. Collins, & C. L. Johnson. (2016). The Current Stress State of the Moon: Implications for Lunar Seismic Activity. LPI. 1642.1 indexed citations
19.
Weber, R. C., et al.. (2011). Imaging the Moon's Core with Seismology. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2011.1 indexed citations
20.
Weber, R. C., B. G. Bills, & C. L. Johnson. (2008). Constraints on Deep Moonquake Focal Mechanisms Through Analyses of Tidal Stress. AGUFM. 2008.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.