Anna Haley‐Lock

658 citations
21 papers · 447 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Haley‐Lock

21 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Anna Haley‐Lock
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Public Administration 68
  • General Health Professions 226
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 66
  • Gender Studies 60
  • Demography 68
Replace Deborah Foster with:
Deborah Foster United Kingdom
Ofer Sharone United States
Vanessa Beck United Kingdom
Sue Yeandle United Kingdom
Rupa Banerjee Canada
Caroline Alcorso Australia
Parveen Kalliath Australia
Larissa Bamberry Australia
Gareth Mulvey United Kingdom
Sudershan Pasupuleti United States
Anna Haley‐Lock relative to Deborah Foster United Kingdom Deborah Foster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Deborah Foster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Haley‐Lock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Haley‐Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Haley‐Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Haley‐Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Haley‐Lock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Haley‐Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Haley‐Lock. The network helps show where Anna Haley‐Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Anna Haley‐Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Haley‐Lock Line = papers co-authored together Anna Haley‐Lock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012115
2 201667
3 200460
4 201529
5 201525
6 200723
7 201119
8 201215
9 200815
10 200713
11 200712
12
Stabilizing Low-Wage Work
201511
13 200910
14 20117
15 20077
16 20135
17 20134
18 20133
19 20113
20 20132

About Anna Haley‐Lock

Anna Haley‐Lock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Public Administration, Demography and Education, having authored 21 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (17 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (10 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (6 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (5 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (68 citations), General Health Professions (226 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (66 citations), Gender Studies (60 citations) and Demography (68 citations). Anna Haley‐Lock has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Susan J. Lambert, Linn Posey‐Maddox, Julia R. Henly, Charlotte Alexander, Jean M. Kruzich and Jeffrey M. Timberlake. Their work appears in journals such as Community Work & Family, Social Service Review, Administration in Social Work, Journal of Industrial Relations and Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact