Dag Nikolaus Hasse

926 citations
12 papers · 119 indexed · h-index 5

Dag Nikolaus Hasse

8 papers receiving 81 citations

Peers

Dag Nikolaus Hasse
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Philosophy 64
  • Classics 18
  • Religious studies 21
  • History and Philosophy of Science 19
  • Archeology 32
Replace Alain de Libéra with:
Alain de Libéra France
Allison P. Coudert United States
Dominic J. O’Meara Switzerland
S. J. Tester Germany
David Bentley Hart United States
Cristina D’Ancona Italy
Kurt Flasch
Averroës
Debra Higgs Strickland United Kingdom
Carl Joachim Classen Germany
Dag Nikolaus Hasse relative to Alain de Libéra France Alain de Libéra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Alain de Libéra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dag Nikolaus Hasse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dag Nikolaus Hasse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dag Nikolaus Hasse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dag Nikolaus Hasse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dag Nikolaus Hasse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dag Nikolaus Hasse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dag Nikolaus Hasse. The network helps show where Dag Nikolaus Hasse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Dag Nikolaus Hasse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dag Nikolaus Hasse Line = papers co-authored together Dag Nikolaus Hasse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 20190
2 201612
3
Success and Suppression: Arabic Sciences and Philosophy in the Renaissance
20164
4 201316
5 201119
6 20083
7 200727
8 20040
9
Avicenna's De anima in the Latin West : the formation of a peripatetic philosophy of the soul 1160-1300
200035
10 19990
11
Observationes. Die lateinischen Schriften
19971
12 19972

About Dag Nikolaus Hasse

Dag Nikolaus Hasse is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Classics, Archeology and History, having authored 12 papers that have together received 119 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval and Classical Philosophy (7 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (64 citations), Classics (18 citations), Religious studies (21 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (19 citations) and Archeology (32 citations). Dag Nikolaus Hasse has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lodi Nauta, Paul Richard Blum, Miguel Á. Granada, Peter Harrison, John P. Doyle, David A. Lines, Dermot Moran, Jill Kraye, Christopher S. Celenza and Brian P. Copenhaver. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, Journal for the History of Astronomy, Vivarium and Harvard University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026