Ann King

947 citations
18 papers · 650 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

Ann King

18 papers receiving 615 citations

Hit Papers

“Best Practice” for Patient-Centered Communication: A Nar...3962013202620172021100200300

Peers

Ann King
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Family Practice 91
  • General Health Professions 323
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 274
  • Pharmacy 39
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 91
Replace William Strull with:
William Strull United States
Nadia M. Bajwa Switzerland
Donald Brady United States
John Patrick T. Co United States
Gene Harkless United States
Kathy Cole‐Kelly United States
Charlene M. Dewey United States
Maryellen E. Gusic United States
Alicia D. Monroe United States
Susan Tallett Canada
Ann King relative to William Strull United States William Strull's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
William Strull · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann King. The network helps show where Ann King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann King Line = papers co-authored together Ann King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20223
3 20221
4 20222
5 20215
6 20187
7 20147
8
“Best Practice” for Patient-Centered Communication: A Narrative Reviewbreakdown →
2013396
9 201320
10 201153
11 200922
12
The disruptive possibilities of looking in classrooms
20063
13 20035
14 19975
15 199438
16 19912
17 197778
18 19751

About Ann King

Ann King is a scholar working on Family Practice, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Pharmacy, Emergency Medical Services and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers) and Radiology practices and education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (91 citations), General Health Professions (323 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (274 citations), Pharmacy (39 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations). Ann King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ruth B. Hoppe, W. K. Slack, S G Darke, Henry Pohl, Janet Mee, Steven A. Haist, Mark R. Raymond, Debra Hayes, Kathleen M. Mazor and C. Suzanne Lea. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR Medical Education, Academic Medicine, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Advances in Health Sciences Education and System.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026