Ann E. Tobey
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 3
-
- Memory Processes and Influences 3
- Co-authors
- Gail S. Goodman (4 shared papers)Kelly A. Brennan (1 shared paper)Phillip R. Shaver (1 shared paper)Holly K. Orcutt (3 shared papers)Jennifer M. Batterman-Faunce (3 shared papers)Sherry Thomas (2 shared papers)Cheryl Shapiro (1 shared paper)Jason R. Stokes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Law and Human Behavior (2 papers)Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (1 paper)Child Abuse & Neglect (1 paper)Critical Care Nurse (1 paper)VCU Scholars Compass (Virginia Commonwealth University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Ann E. Tobey
6 papers receiving 488 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Social Psychology 354
- Clinical Psychology 261
- Demography 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 161
- Law 74
Countries citing papers authored by Ann E. Tobey
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann E. Tobey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann E. Tobey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann E. Tobey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann E. Tobey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann E. Tobey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann E. Tobey. The network helps show where Ann E. Tobey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Ann E. Tobey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 218 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 124 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 116 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 62 | |
| 5 | Balancing the rights of children and defendants: Effects of closed-circuit television on children's accuracy and jurors' perceptions. | 1995 | 23 |
| 6 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 0 |
About Ann E. Tobey
Ann E. Tobey is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Law, General Health Professions and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper) and Law in Society and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (354 citations), Clinical Psychology (261 citations), Demography (100 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations) and Law (74 citations). Ann E. Tobey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gail S. Goodman, Kelly A. Brennan, Phillip R. Shaver, Holly K. Orcutt, Jennifer M. Batterman-Faunce, Sherry Thomas, Cheryl Shapiro, Jason R. Stokes, Bradi B. Granger and Julie Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Law and Human Behavior, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Child Abuse & Neglect, Critical Care Nurse and VCU Scholars Compass (Virginia Commonwealth University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.