Ann E. Kelley Sobel
- Information Systems top 5%
- Software top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Co-authors
- Michael R. ClarksonRichard J. LeBlancTimothy C. LethbridgeThomas B. HilburnJames D. KiperJ.B. ThompsonAlan R. HevnerR.C. Linger
- Topics
- Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (16 papers)Teaching and Learning Programming (13 papers)Software Engineering Research (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ann E. Kelley Sobel
39 papers receiving 233 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Information Systems 147
- Software 80
- Computer Science Applications 75
- Artificial Intelligence 53
- Computer Networks and Communications 31
Countries citing papers authored by Ann E. Kelley Sobel
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann E. Kelley Sobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann E. Kelley Sobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann E. Kelley Sobel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann E. Kelley Sobel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann E. Kelley Sobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann E. Kelley Sobel. The network helps show where Ann E. Kelley Sobel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann E. Kelley Sobel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann E. Kelley Sobel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann E. Kelley Sobel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann E. Kelley Sobel. Ann E. Kelley Sobel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Resolving the Program-Verification Debate | 0 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | Applying an Operational Formal Method to Safety-Critical Systems | 3 |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | Modular verification of concurrent systems / | 4 |
About Ann E. Kelley Sobel
Ann E. Kelley Sobel is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Software and Information Systems, having authored 46 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (16 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (13 papers) and Software Engineering Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (80 citations), Computer Science Applications (75 citations) and Information Systems (147 citations). Ann E. Kelley Sobel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Clarkson, Richard J. LeBlanc, Timothy C. Lethbridge, Thomas B. Hilburn, James D. Kiper, J.B. Thompson, Alan R. Hevner, R.C. Linger, Gary McGraw and Gwendolyn H. Walton. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering and Computer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.