Ann Bowling

14 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

Ann Bowling
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Research and Theory 34
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
  • Leadership and Management 10
  • Physiology 153
  • Family Practice 8
Replace Carrie Westmoreland Miller with:
Carrie Westmoreland Miller United States
Lori Persico United States
Trisha Leann Horsley United States
Esperanza Zuriguel‐Pérez Spain
Carole Gilmour Australia
KT Waxman United States
Cherene Kelly Australia
Verónica Rita Dias Coutinho Portugal
Anne M. Schoening United States
Helen Bellchambers Australia
Ann Bowling relative to Carrie Westmoreland Miller United States Carrie Westmoreland Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Carrie Westmoreland Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Bowling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Bowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Bowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Bowling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Bowling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Bowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Bowling. The network helps show where Ann Bowling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ann Bowling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ann Bowling Line = papers co-authored together Ann Bowling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2019144
2 201838
3 201525
4 201624
5 199118
6 201616
7 198412
8
National Evaluation of Partnerships for Older People Projects: Interim Report of Progress
20086
9
Research Methods In Health (Second Edition)
20025
10 20185
11 20225
12 20134
13
The Effect of Simulation on Knowledge, Self-Confidence, and Skill Performance
20112
14 20172
15 20220
16 20230

About Ann Bowling

Ann Bowling is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Education, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (6 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers) and Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (34 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations), Leadership and Management (10 citations), Physiology (153 citations) and Family Practice (8 citations). Ann Bowling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Chidozie Edwin Nwafor, Konstantinos Tsaras, Denise M. McEnroe–Petitte, Leodoro J. Labrague, Kenneth A. Grant, Shah Ebrahim, Kay J. Cowen, Martín Knapp, Karen Windle and F. D‘Amico. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Nursing, Nursing Education Perspectives, Teaching and learning in nursing, Nursing and Health Sciences and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact