Nursing Education Perspectives

1.7k papers and 14.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Nursing Education Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Nursing Education Perspectives usually cover General Health Professions (501 papers), Education (453 papers) and Physiology (431 papers) specifically the topics of Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (428 papers), Nursing education and management (403 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (268 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nursing Education Perspectives are Diane J. Skiba, Pamela R. Jeffries, Katie Anne Adamson, Mary N. Hall, Amy L. Weaver, Fidelindo Lim, Gerry Altmiller, Anne M. Schoening, Beth Rodgers and Tonya Rutherford-Hemming.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nursing Education Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nursing Education Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nursing Education Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Nursing Education Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nursing Education Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nursing Education Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nursing Education Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025