Angela Mendelovici
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Philipp KoralusCarolyn ParkinsonWalter Sinnott‐ArmstrongThalia WheatleyVictoria McGeerDavid Bourget
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers)
- Cited by
- History and Philosophy of ScienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyCognitive Neuroscience
In The Last Decade
Angela Mendelovici
14 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Cognitive Neuroscience 185
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
- Philosophy 87
- Social Psychology 86
- History and Philosophy of Science 73
Countries citing papers authored by Angela Mendelovici
This map shows the geographic impact of Angela Mendelovici's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angela Mendelovici with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angela Mendelovici more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angela Mendelovici
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angela Mendelovici. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angela Mendelovici. The network helps show where Angela Mendelovici may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angela Mendelovici
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angela Mendelovici. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angela Mendelovici based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angela Mendelovici. Angela Mendelovici is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 104 | |
| 19 | Mental Representation and Closely Conflated Topics | 14 |
About Angela Mendelovici
Angela Mendelovici is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (185 citations). Angela Mendelovici has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Czechia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Philipp Koralus, Carolyn Parkinson, Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong, Thalia Wheatley, Victoria McGeer and David Bourget. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.