Aneez Esmail
Impact in
- Family Practice top 0.5%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Emergency Medical Services top 0.2%
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management 20
- Pharmacy 27
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues 26
- Co-authors
- Maria PanagiotiEfharis PanagopoulouPeter BowerCarl MayKeith GeraghtyJohn SandarsCarolyn Chew‐GrahamEvangelos Kontopantelis
- Journals
- BMJ (11 papers)European Journal of General Practice (9 papers)British Journal of General Practice (8 papers)BMJ Open (6 papers)BMJ Quality & Safety (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Aneez Esmail
118 papers receiving 4.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
- Family Practice 423
- Emergency Medical Services 847
- Pharmacy 515
- General Health Professions 2.5k
- Health Information Management 393
Countries citing papers authored by Aneez Esmail
This map shows the geographic impact of Aneez Esmail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aneez Esmail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aneez Esmail more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aneez Esmail
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aneez Esmail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aneez Esmail. The network helps show where Aneez Esmail may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Aneez Esmail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 76 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 97 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 61 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 16 | Asian doctors in the NHS: service and betrayal. | 2007 | 19 |
| 17 | 2007 | 66 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 139 | |
| 19 | Do differences in the prevalence of risk factors explain the higher mortality from sudden infant death syndrome in New Zealand compared with the UK? | 1996 | 10 |
| 20 | 1995 | 12 |
About Aneez Esmail
Aneez Esmail is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Pharmacy, Emergency Medical Services, Family Practice and General Health Professions, having authored 121 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (26 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (20 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (18 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (17 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (15 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (13 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (12 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (423 citations), Emergency Medical Services (847 citations), Pharmacy (515 citations), General Health Professions (2.5k citations) and Health Information Management (393 citations). Aneez Esmail has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Maria Panagioti, Efharis Panagopoulou, Peter Bower, Carl May, Keith Geraghty, John Sandars, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, Evangelos Kontopantelis, George Lewith and Harm van Marwijk. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, European Journal of General Practice, British Journal of General Practice, BMJ Open and BMJ Quality & Safety.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.