Andrew T. Koppisch
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Catalysis top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- David T. FoxRico E. Del SestoC. Dale PoulterBrian S. J. BlaggTheresa L. KernMichael ZakrewskySamir MitragotriChaitan Khosla
- Topics
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (9 papers)Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (6 papers)Biochemical and Molecular Research (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeRussia
In The Last Decade
Andrew T. Koppisch
36 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Molecular Biology 749
- Catalysis 325
- Organic Chemistry 227
- Pharmacology 219
- Biomedical Engineering 158
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew T. Koppisch
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew T. Koppisch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew T. Koppisch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew T. Koppisch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew T. Koppisch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew T. Koppisch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew T. Koppisch. The network helps show where Andrew T. Koppisch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew T. Koppisch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew T. Koppisch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew T. Koppisch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew T. Koppisch. Andrew T. Koppisch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 68 | |
| 10 | 113 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 86 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 113 | |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Andrew T. Koppisch
Andrew T. Koppisch is a scholar working on Catalysis, Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (9 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (6 papers) and Biochemical and Molecular Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (325 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (140 citations) and Filtration and Separation (35 citations). Andrew T. Koppisch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Russia. Frequent co-authors include David T. Fox, Rico E. Del Sesto, C. Dale Poulter, Brian S. J. Blagg, Theresa L. Kern, Michael Zakrewsky, Samir Mitragotri, Chaitan Khosla, Katherine S. Lovejoy and Kinya Hotta. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.