Andrew T. Holycross
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 11
- Virology top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology 22
- Genetics top 10%
- Genetic diversity and population structure 7
-
- Turtle Biology and Conservation 3
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 3
-
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 8
-
- Vector-borne infectious diseases 3
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Michael E. DouglasStephen P. MackessyCharles W. PainterStephen R. GoldbergDustin A. WoodAmy G. VandergastRobert N. FisherLawrence J. Smith
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
Andrew T. Holycross
27 papers receiving 417 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Ecological Modeling 86
- Virology 67
- Global and Planetary Change 255
- Genetics 252
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 96
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew T. Holycross
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew T. Holycross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew T. Holycross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew T. Holycross more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew T. Holycross
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew T. Holycross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew T. Holycross. The network helps show where Andrew T. Holycross may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew T. Holycross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 4 | Diadophis Punctuatus (Ring-necked Snake). Diet. | 2016 | 1 |
| 5 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 61 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 46 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 27 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 7 |
About Andrew T. Holycross
Andrew T. Holycross is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Parasitology and Ecology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (22 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (7 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (3 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (86 citations), Virology (67 citations), Global and Planetary Change (255 citations), Genetics (252 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (96 citations). Andrew T. Holycross has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Douglas, Stephen P. Mackessy, Charles W. Painter, Stephen R. Goldberg, Dustin A. Wood, Amy G. Vandergast, Robert N. Fisher, Lawrence J. Smith, Michael D. Cardwell and Hans‐Werner Herrmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Herpetology, Copeia, Conservation Genetics, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Journal of Wildlife Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.