Journal of Wildlife Diseases

6.3k papers and 107.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.3k papers published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases in the last decades have received a total of 107.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases usually cover Parasitology (1.8k papers), Ecology (1.6k papers) and Infectious Diseases (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Viral Infections and Vectors (940 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (799 papers) and Bird parasitology and diseases (694 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Wildlife Diseases are Elizabeth Williams, Michael W. Miller, Anne Fairbrother, Gary A. Wobeser, Stuart Young, Zdeněk Hubálek, David E. Stallknecht, Frances M. D. Gulland, Michael L. Kent and William R. Davidson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Wildlife Diseases

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Wildlife Diseases more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025