John F. Mulley

1.5k total citations
20 papers, 475 citations indexed

About

John F. Mulley is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, John F. Mulley has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 475 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Genetics, 11 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in John F. Mulley's work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (4 papers) and Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (4 papers). John F. Mulley is often cited by papers focused on Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (4 papers) and Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (4 papers). John F. Mulley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. John F. Mulley's co-authors include Adam D Hargreaves, Martin Swain, Peter W. H. Holland, Matthew Hegarty, Darren W. Logan, Chi-hua Chiu, Katherine A. Steele, Raban Heller, Juan J. Calvete and Andrew T. Holycross and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

John F. Mulley

18 papers receiving 474 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John F. Mulley United Kingdom 10 289 238 97 84 72 20 475
Benedito C. Prezoto Brazil 14 412 1.4× 236 1.0× 151 1.6× 47 0.6× 84 1.2× 28 570
Adam D Hargreaves United Kingdom 7 611 2.1× 226 0.9× 408 4.2× 80 1.0× 158 2.2× 10 720
Michihisa Toriba Japan 11 435 1.5× 150 0.6× 90 0.9× 141 1.7× 40 0.6× 26 552
Dilza Trevisan-Silva Brazil 17 815 2.8× 550 2.3× 87 0.9× 32 0.4× 169 2.3× 33 1.0k
Ana M. Salazar Venezuela 12 322 1.1× 146 0.6× 153 1.6× 31 0.4× 98 1.4× 27 440
Matt W. Giorgianni United States 7 250 0.9× 222 0.9× 84 0.9× 80 1.0× 53 0.7× 9 426
Álvaro Rossan de Brandão Prieto da Silva Brazil 14 424 1.5× 334 1.4× 114 1.2× 22 0.3× 63 0.9× 36 605
Peter Mirtschin Australia 19 760 2.6× 337 1.4× 389 4.0× 175 2.1× 230 3.2× 49 901
Giulia Irene Maria Pasquesi United States 11 166 0.6× 154 0.6× 21 0.2× 129 1.5× 19 0.3× 13 361
Camila Renjifo Australia 5 720 2.5× 439 1.8× 197 2.0× 135 1.6× 200 2.8× 6 933

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Mulley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Mulley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Mulley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Mulley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Mulley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Mulley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Mulley. The network helps show where John F. Mulley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Mulley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Mulley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Mulley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Mulley. John F. Mulley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Marshall, Benjamin Michael, et al.. (2025). A reliance on human habitats is key to the success of an introduced predatory reptile. PLoS ONE. 20(2). e0310352–e0310352.
2.
Hegarty, Matthew, et al.. (2023). Shed skin as a source of DNA for genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in reptiles. Conservation Genetics Resources. 15(3). 117–124. 3 indexed citations
3.
Papadopulos, Alexander S. T., Eva Julià, Òscar Fornas, et al.. (2023). A New Chromosome-Assigned Mongolian Gerbil Genome Allows Characterization of Complete Centromeres and a Fully Heterochromatic Chromosome. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 40(5). 4 indexed citations
5.
Mulley, John F.. (2021). Regulation of posterior Hox genes by sex steroids explains vertebral variation in inbred mouse strains. Journal of Anatomy. 240(4). 735–745. 2 indexed citations
6.
Pracana, Rodrigo, Adam D Hargreaves, John F. Mulley, & Peter W. H. Holland. (2020). Runaway GC Evolution in Gerbil Genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 37(8). 2197–2210. 8 indexed citations
7.
Zancolli, Giulia, Juan J. Calvete, Michael D. Cardwell, et al.. (2019). When one phenotype is not enough: divergent evolutionary trajectories govern venom variation in a widespread rattlesnake species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 286(1898). 20182735–20182735. 83 indexed citations
8.
Steele, Katherine A., et al.. (2019). A high-density genetic map and molecular sex-typing assay for gerbils. Mammalian Genome. 30(3-4). 63–70. 4 indexed citations
9.
Mulley, John F.. (2019). Greater Loss of Female Embryos During Human Pregnancy: A Novel Mechanism. BioEssays. 41(11). e1900063–e1900063. 5 indexed citations
10.
Hargreaves, Adam D, Long Zhou, Ferdinand Marlétaz, et al.. (2017). Genome sequence of a diabetes-prone rodent reveals a mutation hotspot around the ParaHox gene cluster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(29). 7677–7682. 24 indexed citations
11.
Steele, Katherine A., et al.. (2017). Inbred or Outbred? Genetic Diversity in Laboratory Rodent Colonies. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. 8(2). 679–686. 35 indexed citations
12.
Hargreaves, Adam D & John F. Mulley. (2015). Assessing the utility of the Oxford Nanopore MinION for snake venom gland cDNA sequencing. PeerJ. 3. e1441–e1441. 24 indexed citations
13.
Mulley, John F., Adam D Hargreaves, Matthew Hegarty, Raban Heller, & Martin Swain. (2014). Transcriptomic analysis of the lesser spotted catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula) pancreas, liver and brain reveals molecular level conservation of vertebrate pancreas function. BMC Genomics. 15(1). 1074–1074. 33 indexed citations
14.
Hargreaves, Adam D, Martin Swain, Darren W. Logan, & John F. Mulley. (2014). Testing the Toxicofera: Comparative transcriptomics casts doubt on the single, early evolution of the reptile venom system. Toxicon. 92. 140–156. 53 indexed citations
15.
Hargreaves, Adam D, Martin Swain, Matthew Hegarty, Darren W. Logan, & John F. Mulley. (2014). Restriction and Recruitment—Gene Duplication and the Origin and Evolution of Snake Venom Toxins. Genome Biology and Evolution. 6(8). 2088–2095. 105 indexed citations
16.
Mulley, John F. & Peter W. H. Holland. (2013). Genomic organisation of the seven ParaHox genes of coelacanths. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution. 322(6). 352–358. 3 indexed citations
17.
Mulley, John F. & Peter W. H. Holland. (2010). Parallel Retention of Pdx2 Genes in Cartilaginous Fish and Coelacanths. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 27(10). 2386–2391. 18 indexed citations
18.
Mulley, John F., Ying‐Fu Zhong, & Peter W. H. Holland. (2009). Comparative genomics of chondrichthyan Hoxa clusters. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 9(1). 218–218. 12 indexed citations
19.
Furlong, Rebecca F. & John F. Mulley. (2008). ParaHox Cluster Evolution — Hagfish and Beyond. ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE. 25(10). 955–959. 5 indexed citations
20.
Mulley, John F., Chi-hua Chiu, & Peter W. H. Holland. (2006). Breakup of a homeobox cluster after genome duplication in teleosts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103(27). 10369–10372. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026