Charlotte Methuen
-
- Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies 4
- History of Science and Medicine 4
- Classics top 10%
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 4
- History top 5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 19
- Religious studies top 5%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 3
-
- Historical Astronomy and Related Studies 7
-
- Religion, Society, and Development 4
- Religion and Society Interactions 3
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Charlotte Methuen
26 papers receiving 75 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- History and Philosophy of Science 30
- Classics 16
- History 41
- Religious studies 18
- Anthropology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte Methuen
This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte Methuen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte Methuen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte Methuen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte Methuen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte Methuen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte Methuen. The network helps show where Charlotte Methuen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Charlotte Methuen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 5 | Religion and the household : papers read at the 2012 summer meeting and the 2013 winter meeting of the Ecclesiastical History Society | 2014 | 0 |
| 6 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 7 | Marriage: one man and one woman? | 2013 | 1 |
| 8 | The Church on its Past | 2013 | 3 |
| 9 | The Church and Literature | 2012 | 4 |
| 10 | Luther and Calvin: Religious Revolutionaries | 2011 | 0 |
| 11 | 'novam sprach, celeste deudsch': eine Untersuchung der theologischen Sprache von Luthers Bibelübersetzung | 2010 | 1 |
| 12 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 13 | On the threshold of a new age: expanding horizons as the broader context of scriptural interpretation | 2008 | 1 |
| 14 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 4 |
About Charlotte Methuen
Charlotte Methuen is a scholar working on History, Classics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (19 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (7 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations), Classics (16 citations) and History (41 citations). Charlotte Methuen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Clarke, John Doran, Alexandra Walsham and Andrew Spicer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.