Andrew Skalkin
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Education top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Seth NessNikolay V. ManyakovGahan PandinaAbigail BangerterMatthew S. GoodwinFrederick ShicGéraldine DawsonBennett Leventhal
- Topics
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Autism and Developmental DisordersFrontiers in NeuroscienceJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Andrew Skalkin
14 papers receiving 339 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Cognitive Neuroscience 246
- Psychiatry and Mental health 79
- Education 79
- Clinical Psychology 71
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 44
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Skalkin
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Skalkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Skalkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Skalkin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Skalkin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Skalkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Skalkin. The network helps show where Andrew Skalkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Skalkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Skalkin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Skalkin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Skalkin. Andrew Skalkin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 55 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 23 |
About Andrew Skalkin
Andrew Skalkin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (246 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations) and Occupational Therapy (19 citations). Andrew Skalkin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Seth Ness, Nikolay V. Manyakov, Gahan Pandina, Abigail Bangerter, Matthew S. Goodwin, Frederick Shic, Géraldine Dawson, Bennett Leventhal, Robert L. Hendren and Matthew Boice. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Frontiers in Neuroscience and Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.