Naomi Zack
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Crispin SartwellLaurie ShrageRichard S. RobinLisa TessmanJoel IsaacAlison BaileyJohn GrecoMurray G. Murphey
- Topics
- Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers)Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (5 papers)Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Naomi Zack
39 papers receiving 568 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Sociology and Political Science 484
- Political Science and International Relations 125
- Social Psychology 84
- Philosophy 77
- Gender Studies 76
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Zack
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Zack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Zack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Zack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Zack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Zack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Zack. The network helps show where Naomi Zack may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Zack
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Zack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Zack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Zack. Naomi Zack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | The Philosophical Roots of Racial Essentialism and Its Legacy | 4 |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | A Symposium on Murray G. Murphey, C.I. Lewis: The last great pragmatist | 1 |
| 13 | Philosophy and Disaster | 7 |
| 14 | Inclusive Feminism: A Third Wave Theory of Women's Commonality | 67 |
| 15 | Women of color and philosophy : a critical reader | 17 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Whiteness: Feminist Philosophical Reflections | 0 |
| 18 | The first 50 years: A review of the Department of Energy domestic safeguards and security program | 1 |
| 19 | Bachelors of Science: Seventeenth Century Identity, Then and Now | 7 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Naomi Zack
Naomi Zack is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 46 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (5 papers) and Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (51 citations), Sociology and Political Science (484 citations) and Gender Studies (76 citations). Naomi Zack has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Crispin Sartwell, Laurie Shrage, Richard S. Robin, Lisa Tessman, Joel Isaac, Alison Bailey, John Greco, Murray G. Murphey and John Corcoran. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Hypatia and Anthropological Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.