Michael McConville
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Law top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- John BaldwinNigel FieldingAndrew SandersRoger LengJacqueline HodgsonElizabeth Chase MacRaeMark JacksonWing Hong Chui
- Topics
- Criminal Law and Evidence (11 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Michael McConville
26 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Sociology and Political Science 212
- Law 146
- Political Science and International Relations 124
- Clinical Psychology 81
- Social Psychology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Michael McConville
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael McConville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael McConville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael McConville more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael McConville
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael McConville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael McConville. The network helps show where Michael McConville may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael McConville
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael McConville. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael McConville based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael McConville. Michael McConville is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Criminal Justice in China: An Empirical Inquiry | 28 |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | The handbook of the criminal justice process | 38 |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | Standing Accused: The Organization and Practices of Criminal Defence Lawyers in Britain | 33 |
| 9 | Custodial legal advice and the right to silence | 41 |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | A Small War In The Balkans : British Military Involvement in Wartime Yugoslavia 1941-1945 | 0 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | Confessions in Crown Court trials | 28 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Michael McConville
Michael McConville is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Evidence (11 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (146 citations), Political Science and International Relations (124 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (212 citations). Michael McConville has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John Baldwin, Nigel Fielding, Andrew Sanders, Roger Leng, Jacqueline Hodgson, Elizabeth Chase MacRae, Mark Jackson, Wing Hong Chui, Eva Pils and John R. Baldwin. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Science Advances and British Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.