Andrew S. Rancer
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Communication top 1%
- Education top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dominic A. InfanteTheodore Ä. AvtgisYang LinDeanna Ferree WomackAnne M. NicoteraShinobu SuzukiCharles J. WigleyRebecca M. Chory
- Topics
- Communication in Education and Healthcare (30 papers)Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (12 papers)Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Andrew S. Rancer
43 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Social Psychology 1.3k
- Literature and Literary Theory 447
- Sociology and Political Science 445
- Communication 381
- Education 318
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew S. Rancer
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew S. Rancer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew S. Rancer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew S. Rancer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew S. Rancer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew S. Rancer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew S. Rancer. The network helps show where Andrew S. Rancer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew S. Rancer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew S. Rancer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew S. Rancer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew S. Rancer. Andrew S. Rancer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | Arguments, aggression, and conflict : new directions in theory and research | 84 |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | Assessing Aggressive Communication in Adolescents: Problems and Alternatives. | 1 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 209 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 60 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | A Conceptualization and Measure of Argumentativenessbreakdown → | 380 |
About Andrew S. Rancer
Andrew S. Rancer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Communication, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Communication in Education and Healthcare (30 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (12 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.3k citations), Communication (381 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (447 citations). Andrew S. Rancer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Dominic A. Infante, Theodore Ä. Avtgis, Yang Lin, Deanna Ferree Womack, Anne M. Nicotera, Shinobu Suzuki, Charles J. Wigley, Rebecca M. Chory, Carolyn M. Anderson and Linda L. Pierce. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality Assessment, Communication Monographs and Communication Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.