Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Biomass Estimation Methods for Tropical Forests with Applications to Forest Inventory Data
1989950 citationsSandra Brown, Andrew Gillespie et al.Forest Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Gillespie
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Gillespie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Gillespie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Gillespie. The network helps show where Andrew Gillespie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Gillespie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Gillespie.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Gillespie based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Gillespie. Andrew Gillespie is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gillespie, Andrew. (2019). Economics for Business. Oxford University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
2.
Gillespie, Andrew. (2019). Foundations of Economics. Oxford University Press eBooks.5 indexed citations
Cornford, James, et al.. (2006). Transformation of regional societies through ICTs: State(s) of the Art(s). ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University).1 indexed citations
5.
Gillespie, Andrew & Jonathan Rutherford. (2004). The Brave New World of the 21st Century Home.2 indexed citations
Gillespie, Andrew, Ranald Richardson, & James Cornford. (2001). Regional development and the new economy. Econstor (Econstor). 6(1). 109–131.41 indexed citations
8.
Richardson, Ranald & Andrew Gillespie. (2000). Call centre periphery: Teleservices and economic development in rural Scotland. 75(1). 79–86.4 indexed citations
Gillespie, Andrew, Ranald Richardson, Gérard Valenduc, & Patricia Vendramin. (1999). Technology induced atypical work forms. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).1 indexed citations
11.
Li, Feng & Andrew Gillespie. (1994). Team Telework: An Emergent Form of Work Organization. 397–418.2 indexed citations
Gillespie, Andrew, et al.. (1990). Volume tables for young plantation-grown hybrid mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla × S. mahagoni) in the Luquillo Experimental Forest of Puerto Rico..2 indexed citations
18.
Brown, Sandra, Andrew Gillespie, & Ariel E. Lugo. (1989). Biomass Estimation Methods for Tropical Forests with Applications to Forest Inventory Data. Forest Science. 35(4). 881–902.950 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.