Industrial relations

198 papers receiving 412 citations

Countries where authors publish papers about Industrial relations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Industrial relations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Industrial relations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Industrial relations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers about Industrial relations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Industrial relations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Industrial relations.

About Industrial relations

13.5k papers covering Industrial relations have received a total of 25.4k indexed citations since 1950 . Papers on Industrial relations are most often about the specific topic of Legal and Labor Studies, Human Rights and Immigration and Italian Social Issues and Migration and also cover the fields of Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration and Safety Research. Papers citing work on Industrial relations are usually about Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and Law. Some of the most active scholars covering Industrial relations are Alain Supiot, Jacqueline Andall, Avery Sen, Frances Stewart, Gianfranco Pasquino, P. Alston, Norberto Bobbio, Sabino Cassese, Emilio Reyneri and Giovanna Cerami.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026