Ancrêt Szpak

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 820 citations indexed

About

Ancrêt Szpak is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Ancrêt Szpak has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 820 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Ancrêt Szpak's work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (11 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers). Ancrêt Szpak is often cited by papers focused on Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (11 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers). Ancrêt Szpak collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Ancrêt Szpak's co-authors include Tobias Loetscher, Dimitrios Saredakis, Stefan Carlo Michalski, Brandon Birckhead, Hannah A. D. Keage, Albert Rizzo, Mark Billinghurst, Tyler J. Ross, Celia S. Chen and Michael E. R. Nicholls and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, IEEE Access and Neuropsychologia.

In The Last Decade

Ancrêt Szpak

17 papers receiving 806 citations

Hit Papers

Factors Associated With V... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ancrêt Szpak Australia 11 507 190 172 143 126 18 820
Dimitrios Saredakis Australia 9 442 0.9× 164 0.9× 138 0.8× 100 0.7× 108 0.9× 13 852
Polona Caserman Germany 12 354 0.7× 125 0.7× 116 0.7× 97 0.7× 153 1.2× 17 716
Séamas Weech Canada 11 741 1.5× 337 1.8× 85 0.5× 246 1.7× 171 1.4× 14 1.0k
Wenge Xu China 16 600 1.2× 194 1.0× 109 0.6× 105 0.7× 210 1.7× 40 800
L. James Smart United States 12 500 1.0× 420 2.2× 67 0.4× 249 1.7× 45 0.4× 25 993
Elise Faugloire France 10 360 0.7× 227 1.2× 64 0.4× 149 1.0× 35 0.3× 11 544
Sophie Kenny Canada 9 448 0.9× 200 1.1× 80 0.5× 159 1.1× 111 0.9× 12 796
Justin Munafo United States 6 306 0.6× 132 0.7× 52 0.3× 93 0.7× 61 0.5× 6 480
Moira B. Flanagan United States 9 440 0.9× 276 1.5× 56 0.3× 171 1.2× 52 0.4× 13 623
Augusto García-Agúndez Germany 10 280 0.6× 105 0.6× 40 0.2× 77 0.5× 115 0.9× 24 598

Countries citing papers authored by Ancrêt Szpak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ancrêt Szpak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ancrêt Szpak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ancrêt Szpak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ancrêt Szpak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ancrêt Szpak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ancrêt Szpak. The network helps show where Ancrêt Szpak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ancrêt Szpak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ancrêt Szpak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ancrêt Szpak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ancrêt Szpak. Ancrêt Szpak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Franzè, Annamaria, et al.. (2024). Immersive virtual reality is more effective than non‐immersive devices for developing real‐world skills in people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 68(12). 1358–1373. 4 indexed citations
2.
Michalski, Stefan Carlo, et al.. (2023). Improving real-world skills in people with intellectual disabilities: an immersive virtual reality intervention. Virtual Reality. 27(4). 3521–3532. 12 indexed citations
3.
Michalski, Stefan Carlo, et al.. (2022). Using Virtual Reality to Improve Classroom Behavior in People With Down Syndrome: Within-Subjects Experimental Design. JMIR Serious Games. 10(2). e34373–e34373. 10 indexed citations
4.
Szpak, Ancrêt, et al.. (2022). Getting the Most out of Virtual Reality: Evaluating Short Breaks to Reduce Cybersickness and Cognitive Aftereffects. 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). 533–537. 7 indexed citations
5.
Michalski, Stefan Carlo, et al.. (2021). Vocational Training in Virtual Environments for People With Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 627301–627301. 14 indexed citations
6.
Clark, Ross A., Ancrêt Szpak, Stefan Carlo Michalski, & Tobias Loetscher. (2021). Rest Intervals during Virtual Reality Gaming Augments Standing Postural Sway Disturbance. Sensors. 21(20). 6817–6817. 6 indexed citations
7.
Saredakis, Dimitrios, Ancrêt Szpak, Brandon Birckhead, et al.. (2020). Factors Associated With Virtual Reality Sickness in Head-Mounted Displays: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 14. 96–96. 430 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Szpak, Ancrêt, Stefan Carlo Michalski, & Tobias Loetscher. (2020). Exergaming With Beat Saber: An Investigation of Virtual Reality Aftereffects. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(10). e19840–e19840. 60 indexed citations
10.
Szpak, Ancrêt, Stefan Carlo Michalski, Dimitrios Saredakis, Celia S. Chen, & Tobias Loetscher. (2019). Beyond Feeling Sick: The Visual and Cognitive Aftereffects of Virtual Reality. IEEE Access. 7. 130883–130892. 63 indexed citations
11.
Michalski, Stefan Carlo, Ancrêt Szpak, & Tobias Loetscher. (2019). Using Virtual Environments to Improve Real-World Motor Skills in Sports: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 2159–2159. 61 indexed citations
12.
Saredakis, Dimitrios, Ancrêt Szpak, Brandon Birckhead, et al.. (2019). Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints). 13 indexed citations
13.
Michalski, Stefan Carlo, Ancrêt Szpak, Dimitrios Saredakis, et al.. (2019). Getting your game on: Using virtual reality to improve real table tennis skills. PLoS ONE. 14(9). e0222351–e0222351. 95 indexed citations
14.
Szpak, Ancrêt, et al.. (2017). Close interpersonal proximity modulates visuomotor processing of object affordances in shared, social space. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 80(1). 54–68. 10 indexed citations
15.
Szpak, Ancrêt, et al.. (2015). Visual asymmetries for relative depth judgments in a three-dimensional space. Brain and Cognition. 99. 128–134. 5 indexed citations
16.
Szpak, Ancrêt, Michael E. R. Nicholls, Nicole A. Thomas, Simon M. Laham, & Tobias Loetscher. (2015). “No man is an island”: Effects of interpersonal proximity on spatial attention. Cognitive Neuroscience. 7(1-4). 45–54. 7 indexed citations
17.
Szpak, Ancrêt, Nicole A. Thomas, & Michael E. R. Nicholls. (2015). Hemispheric asymmetries in perceived depth revealed through a radial line bisection task. Experimental Brain Research. 234(3). 807–813. 4 indexed citations
18.
Szpak, Ancrêt, Tobias Loetscher, Owen Churches, et al.. (2014). Keeping your distance: attentional withdrawal in individuals who show physiological signs of social discomfort. Neuropsychologia. 70. 462–467. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026