Simon M. Laham

2.7k total citations
69 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Simon M. Laham is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Simon M. Laham has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 40 papers in Social Psychology and 36 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Simon M. Laham's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (39 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (31 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (18 papers). Simon M. Laham is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (39 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (31 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (18 papers). Simon M. Laham collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Simon M. Laham's co-authors include Joseph P. Forgas, Kipling D. Williams, Nick Haslam, Peter Koval, Damien L. Crone, Yoshihisa Kashima, Adam L. Alter, Brock Bastian, Patrick Vargas and William von Hippel and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Simon M. Laham

68 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Simon M. Laham Australia 22 822 758 713 253 183 69 1.7k
Dominic J. Packer United States 21 896 1.1× 1.1k 1.4× 650 0.9× 339 1.3× 192 1.0× 42 1.9k
Katie A. Liljenquist United States 10 945 1.1× 809 1.1× 637 0.9× 372 1.5× 161 0.9× 15 1.9k
Simona Sacchi Italy 17 976 1.2× 1.1k 1.5× 629 0.9× 253 1.0× 217 1.2× 67 1.8k
Małgorzata Kossowska Poland 24 732 0.9× 1.2k 1.6× 430 0.6× 212 0.8× 248 1.4× 102 1.9k
Oliver Scott Curry United Kingdom 18 718 0.9× 721 1.0× 425 0.6× 301 1.2× 245 1.3× 43 1.6k
Jason E. Plaks Canada 22 1.0k 1.2× 959 1.3× 451 0.6× 407 1.6× 201 1.1× 56 1.8k
Eugene M. Caruso United States 22 473 0.6× 536 0.7× 467 0.7× 275 1.1× 80 0.4× 46 1.5k
E. J. Horberg United States 10 830 1.0× 594 0.8× 532 0.7× 165 0.7× 162 0.9× 17 1.3k
Fredrik Björklund Sweden 25 942 1.1× 990 1.3× 668 0.9× 391 1.5× 464 2.5× 87 2.3k
Ana Guinote United Kingdom 23 1.4k 1.7× 1.6k 2.1× 611 0.9× 280 1.1× 163 0.9× 59 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Simon M. Laham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon M. Laham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon M. Laham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon M. Laham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon M. Laham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon M. Laham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon M. Laham. The network helps show where Simon M. Laham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Simon M. Laham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Simon M. Laham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Simon M. Laham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Simon M. Laham. Simon M. Laham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Laham, Simon M., et al.. (2023). Where the Head Meets the Heart: ‘Enlightened’ Compassion Lies Between Big Five Openness/Intellect and Agreeableness. Collabra Psychology. 9(1). 4 indexed citations
2.
Laham, Simon M., et al.. (2023). Pathogens or promiscuity? Testing two accounts of the relation between disgust sensitivity and binding moral values.. Emotion. 24(2). 465–478. 3 indexed citations
3.
Warren, Garth, et al.. (2022). Specificity Versus Generality: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Association Between Trait Disgust Sensitivity and Moral Judgment. Emotion Review. 15(1). 63–84. 8 indexed citations
4.
Laham, Simon M., et al.. (2022). Careful what you wish for: the primary role of malicious Envy in Predicting Moral Disengagement. Motivation and Emotion. 46(5). 674–688. 5 indexed citations
5.
White, Joshua P., et al.. (2022). Response time modelling reveals evidence for multiple, distinct sources of moral decision caution. Cognition. 223. 105026–105026. 8 indexed citations
6.
Smillie, Luke D., et al.. (2021). From ordinary to extraordinary: A roadmap for studying the psychology of moral exceptionality. Current Opinion in Psychology. 43. 329–334. 6 indexed citations
7.
Laham, Simon M., et al.. (2021). Searching for meaning is associated with costly prosociality. PLoS ONE. 16(10). e0258769–e0258769. 17 indexed citations
8.
Feuerriegel, Daniel, et al.. (2020). Moral judgements of fairness-related actions are flexibly updated to account for contextual information. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 17828–17828. 13 indexed citations
9.
Crone, Damien L., Joshua J. Rhee, & Simon M. Laham. (2020). Developing brief versions of the Moral Foundations Vignettes using a genetic algorithm-based approach. Behavior Research Methods. 53(3). 1179–1187. 4 indexed citations
10.
Laham, Simon M., et al.. (2019). A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect. Cognition. 190. 105–127. 21 indexed citations
11.
Laham, Simon M., et al.. (2019). Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 72(11). 2605–2613. 7 indexed citations
12.
Crone, Damien L., et al.. (2018). Moral and Affective Film Set (MAAFS): A normed moral video database. PLoS ONE. 13(11). e0206604–e0206604. 14 indexed citations
13.
Crone, Damien L., Stefan Bode, Carsten Murawski, & Simon M. Laham. (2018). The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes. PLoS ONE. 13(1). e0190954–e0190954. 36 indexed citations
14.
Laham, Simon M., et al.. (2016). Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment. The Journal of Social Psychology. 156(6). 594–609. 32 indexed citations
15.
Fernando, Julian W., Yoshihisa Kashima, & Simon M. Laham. (2014). Multiple emotions: A person-centered approach to the relationship between intergroup emotion and action orientation.. Emotion. 14(4). 722–732. 41 indexed citations
16.
Laham, Simon M., et al.. (2013). Elaborated contextual framing is necessary for action-based attitude acquisition. Cognition & Emotion. 28(6). 1119–1126. 17 indexed citations
17.
Bastian, Brock, Simon M. Laham, Samuel Wilson, Nick Haslam, & Peter Koval. (2010). Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology. 50(3). 469–483. 123 indexed citations
18.
Haslam, Nick & Simon M. Laham. (2009). Ten Years on: Does Graduate Student Promise Predict Later Scientific Achievement?.. 14(10). 143–149. 4 indexed citations
19.
Laham, Simon M., Adam L. Alter, & Geoffrey P. Goodwin. (2009). Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer: Discrepantly fluent violations are deemed less morally wrong. Cognition. 112(3). 462–466. 44 indexed citations
20.
Forgas, Joseph P., Kipling D. Williams, & Simon M. Laham. (2004). Social motivation: Conscious and unconscious processes. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 206 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026