Ana S. Iltis
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Physiology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kirstin R.W. MatthewsH. Tristram EngelhardtJames M. DuBoisDaniel F. McCallMark J. CherryDeirdre SawinskiSumit MohanMark Sheehan
- Topics
- Ethics in medical practice (43 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (30 papers)Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (24 papers)
- Cited by
- TransplantationPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthGeneral Health Professions
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPEDIATRICS
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumRussia
In The Last Decade
Ana S. Iltis
96 papers receiving 796 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 491
- General Health Professions 277
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 177
- Physiology 123
- Clinical Psychology 114
Countries citing papers authored by Ana S. Iltis
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana S. Iltis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana S. Iltis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana S. Iltis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana S. Iltis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana S. Iltis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana S. Iltis. The network helps show where Ana S. Iltis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana S. Iltis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana S. Iltis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana S. Iltis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana S. Iltis. Ana S. Iltis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | Religious perspectives in bioethics | 2 |
| 20 | Erreurs de prescription des médicaments cytotoxiques : étude prospective de 5 000 ordonnances | 6 |
About Ana S. Iltis
Ana S. Iltis is a scholar working on Transplantation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 104 papers that have together received 861 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (43 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (30 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (62 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (491 citations) and General Health Professions (277 citations). Ana S. Iltis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Kirstin R.W. Matthews, H. Tristram Engelhardt, James M. DuBois, Daniel F. McCall, Mark J. Cherry, Deirdre Sawinski, Sumit Mohan, Mark Sheehan, Anji Wall and Hisako Matsuo. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.