Nancy M. P. King

4.7k total citations
117 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Nancy M. P. King is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nancy M. P. King has authored 117 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 26 papers in Physiology and 25 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Nancy M. P. King's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (27 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (24 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (15 papers). Nancy M. P. King is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (27 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (24 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (15 papers). Nancy M. P. King collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Nancy M. P. King's co-authors include Celia A. Schiffer, M. Prabu-Jeyabalan, E.A. Nalivaika, Larry R. Churchill, Gail E. Henderson, Arlene M. Davis, Michele M. Easter, Marie‐Pierre de Béthune, Piet Wigerinck and Alan Cross and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Journal of Virology.

In The Last Decade

Nancy M. P. King

109 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nancy M. P. King United States 27 978 844 790 717 492 117 2.9k
Steve Kanters Canada 36 1.7k 1.8× 550 0.7× 521 0.7× 205 0.3× 677 1.4× 119 4.1k
Rabih Halwani Saudi Arabia 40 1.3k 1.3× 477 0.6× 143 0.2× 962 1.3× 217 0.4× 194 5.1k
Fiona Burns United Kingdom 28 1.8k 1.9× 517 0.6× 149 0.2× 365 0.5× 512 1.0× 205 3.2k
Pamela Stratton United States 42 3.8k 3.9× 1.6k 1.9× 1.6k 2.0× 701 1.0× 1.0k 2.1× 129 8.9k
Na He China 31 2.1k 2.1× 367 0.4× 303 0.4× 295 0.4× 648 1.3× 244 4.4k
Wendy Zhang Canada 23 605 0.6× 136 0.2× 342 0.4× 353 0.5× 307 0.6× 81 2.4k
Kavita Nanda United States 31 842 0.9× 200 0.2× 1.2k 1.5× 305 0.4× 560 1.1× 102 4.2k
Lytt I. Gardner United States 41 2.7k 2.8× 717 0.8× 471 0.6× 776 1.1× 1.1k 2.2× 235 6.2k
Jean Jenkins United States 34 266 0.3× 173 0.2× 477 0.6× 886 1.2× 283 0.6× 97 3.8k
David A. Wohl United States 42 4.0k 4.1× 1.8k 2.1× 287 0.4× 296 0.4× 1.1k 2.2× 215 6.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy M. P. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy M. P. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy M. P. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy M. P. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy M. P. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy M. P. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy M. P. King. The network helps show where Nancy M. P. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy M. P. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy M. P. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy M. P. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy M. P. King. Nancy M. P. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
King, Nancy M. P., et al.. (2025). Brain Organoid Research in a Post‐Dobbs World. PubMed. 47(2). 41–47.
2.
Nageswaran, Savithri, William A. Gower, Shannon L. Golden, & Nancy M. P. King. (2022). Collaborative decision‐making: A framework for decision‐making about life‐sustaining treatments in children with medical complexity. Pediatric Pulmonology. 57(12). 3094–3103. 4 indexed citations
3.
King, Nancy M. P., Gail E. Henderson, & Larry R. Churchill. (2022). Bioethics Reenvisioned. University of North Carolina Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
4.
Nageswaran, Savithri, William A. Gower, Nancy M. P. King, & Shannon L. Golden. (2022). Tracheostomy decision-making for children with medical complexity: What supports and resources do caregivers need?. Palliative & Supportive Care. 22(4). 776–782. 10 indexed citations
5.
Peay, Holly L., Rebecca Moultrie, Heidi Cope, et al.. (2022). Education and Consent for Population-Based DNA Screening: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Early Check Newborn Screening Pilot Study. Frontiers in Genetics. 13. 891592–891592. 10 indexed citations
6.
Paquin, Ryan S., Megan A. Lewis, Rebecca Moultrie, et al.. (2020). Outreach to new mothers through direct mail and email: recruitment in the Early Check research study. Clinical and Translational Science. 14(3). 880–889. 8 indexed citations
7.
Nageswaran, Savithri, et al.. (2020). The role of religion and spirituality in caregiver decision-making about tracheostomy for children with medical complexity. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 28(1). 95–107. 12 indexed citations
8.
King, Nancy M. P., et al.. (2019). Regenerative Medicine and the Right to Try. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Nageswaran, Savithri, Shannon L. Golden, William A. Gower, & Nancy M. P. King. (2018). Caregiver Perceptions about their Decision to Pursue Tracheostomy for Children with Medical Complexity. The Journal of Pediatrics. 203. 354–360.e1. 42 indexed citations
10.
Henderson, Gail E., et al.. (2012). What Research Ethics Should Learn from Genomics and Society Research: Lessons from the ELSI Congress of 2011. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 40(4). 1008–1024. 22 indexed citations
11.
Bandaranayake, R.M., Madhavi Kolli, Nancy M. P. King, et al.. (2010). The Effect of Clade-Specific Sequence Polymorphisms on HIV-1 Protease Activity and Inhibitor Resistance Pathways. Journal of Virology. 84(19). 9995–10003. 32 indexed citations
12.
King, Nancy M. P., et al.. (2009). Ethical Issues in Regenerative Medicine. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
13.
King, Nancy M. P.. (2005). Patients, doctors, and illness. 1 indexed citations
14.
King, Nancy M. P., M. Prabu-Jeyabalan, E.A. Nalivaika, & Celia A. Schiffer. (2004). Combating Susceptibility to Drug ResistanceLessons from HIV-1 Protease. Chemistry & Biology. 11(10). 1333–1338. 54 indexed citations
15.
King, Nancy M. P., M. Prabu-Jeyabalan, E.A. Nalivaika, & Celia A. Schiffer. (2004). Combating Susceptibility to Drug Resistance. Chemistry & Biology. 11(10). 1333–1338. 116 indexed citations
16.
King, Nancy M. P.. (2003). The line between clinical innovation and human experimentation.. PubMed. 32(3). 571–80. 12 indexed citations
17.
King, Nancy M. P., et al.. (1999). Beyond regulations : ethics in human subjects research. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 39 indexed citations
18.
King, Nancy M. P., et al.. (1992). Past imperfect, future tense.. PubMed. 102(5288). 24–5. 1 indexed citations
19.
King, Nancy M. P.. (1991). Maternal-fetal conflicts *1Ethical and legal implications for nurse-midwives. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 36(6). 361–365. 3 indexed citations
20.
King, Nancy M. P., Larry R. Churchill, & Alan Cross. (1987). The Physician as captain of the ship : a critical reappraisal. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026