Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez

440 citations
27 papers · 227 indexed · h-index 8

Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez

25 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Education 79
  • Accounting 49
  • Sociology and Political Science 46
  • Strategy and Management 43
  • Information Systems 32
Replace Claudia J. Ferrante with:
Claudia J. Ferrante United States
Dorothea Bowyer Australia
Andreea M. Serban United States
Zulnaidi Yaacob Malaysia
Araceli de los Ríos Berjillos Spain
Elizabeth Rainsbury New Zealand
Mahdi Tajeddin Canada
D. Larry Crumbley United States
Sandra Mottner United States
Mari Jansen van Rensburg South Africa
Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez relative to Claudia J. Ferrante United States Claudia J. Ferrante's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Claudia J. Ferrante · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez. The network helps show where Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez. Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 1
4 5
5 6
6 5
7 2
8 18
9 6
10 3
11 4
12 20
13 52
14 18
15 11
16
A Review on the Multidimensional Analysis of Earnings Quality
3
17 10
18
Mejora del rendimiento de los estudiantes mediante el uso de la gamificación con kahoot
1
19 3
20 2

About Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez

Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez is a scholar working on Accounting, Public Administration and Computer Science Applications, having authored 27 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (6 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (5 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (49 citations), Public Administration (13 citations) and Computer Science Applications (16 citations). Ana Licerán‐Gutiérrez has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, France and Bolivia. Frequent co-authors include Rocío Martínez Jiménez, Manuel Cano Rodrı́guez, Francisca Castilla Polo, Álvaro Labella, Rosa M. Rodríguez, Luis Martı́nez, Nawazish Mirza, Manuel Núñez Nickel and M. Dolores Guerrero‐Baena. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Studies in Higher Education and Educational Technology Research and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026