Amy G. Mazur
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Public Administration top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Dorothy McBride StetsonHege SkjeieDorothy E. McBrideIsabelle EngeliRobert ElgieKaren CelisEmiliano GrossmanMark A. Pollack
- Topics
- Gender Politics and Representation (35 papers)Social Policy and Reform Studies (22 papers)Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Political Science ReviewComparative Political Studies
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amy G. Mazur
52 papers receiving 990 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Gender Studies 885
- Political Science and International Relations 716
- Sociology and Political Science 439
- Public Administration 148
- Strategy and Management 90
Countries citing papers authored by Amy G. Mazur
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy G. Mazur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy G. Mazur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy G. Mazur more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy G. Mazur
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy G. Mazur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy G. Mazur. The network helps show where Amy G. Mazur may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy G. Mazur
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy G. Mazur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy G. Mazur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy G. Mazur. Amy G. Mazur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 90 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Critical Perspectives: Hanna Pitkin’s “Concept of Representation” Revisited. | 5 |
| 9 | Women’s Movement Change: Conceptualization, Measurement and Investigation | 2 |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | Gender and public policy in Europe | 3 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Amy G. Mazur
Amy G. Mazur is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Politics and Representation (35 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (22 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (885 citations), Public Administration (148 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (716 citations). Amy G. Mazur has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dorothy McBride Stetson, Hege Skjeie, Dorothy E. McBride, Isabelle Engeli, Robert Elgie, Karen Celis, Emiliano Grossman, Mark A. Pollack, Gary Goertz and Kathleen Staudt. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Political Science Review and Comparative Political Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.