Amy G. Mazur
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- Gender Politics and Representation 35
- Gender Diversity and Inequality 4
- Gender, Security, and Conflict 4
- Public Administration top 2%
- Labor Movements and Unions 5
-
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 22
-
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 6
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Political Influence and Corporate Strategies 5
-
- French Historical and Cultural Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Dorothy McBride StetsonHege SkjeieDorothy E. McBrideIsabelle EngeliRobert ElgieKaren CelisEmiliano GrossmanMark A. Pollack
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)American Political Science Review (1 paper)Comparative Political Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amy G. Mazur
52 papers receiving 990 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Gender Studies 885
- Public Administration 148
- Political Science and International Relations 716
- Sociology and Political Science 439
- Strategy and Management 90
Countries citing papers authored by Amy G. Mazur
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy G. Mazur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy G. Mazur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy G. Mazur more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy G. Mazur
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy G. Mazur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy G. Mazur. The network helps show where Amy G. Mazur may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy G. Mazur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 90 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 8 | Critical Perspectives: Hanna Pitkin’s “Concept of Representation” Revisited. | 2012 | 5 |
| 9 | Women’s Movement Change: Conceptualization, Measurement and Investigation | 2012 | 2 |
| 10 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 15 | Gender and public policy in Europe | 2009 | 3 |
| 16 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 0 |
About Amy G. Mazur
Amy G. Mazur is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Politics and Representation (35 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (22 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (6 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (4 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (885 citations), Public Administration (148 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (716 citations). Amy G. Mazur has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dorothy McBride Stetson, Hege Skjeie, Dorothy E. McBride, Isabelle Engeli, Robert Elgie, Karen Celis, Emiliano Grossman, Mark A. Pollack, Gary Goertz and Kathleen Staudt. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Political Science Review and Comparative Political Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.