Amy C. Lewis
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Steven J. ShermanDavid L. HamiltonBrian LickelGrażyna WieczorkowskaMatthew T. CrawfordAllen R. McConnellFrancis WestMegan Elliott
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers)Transportation Planning and Optimization (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision ProcessesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amy C. Lewis
10 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sociology and Political Science 854
- Social Psychology 659
- Cognitive Neuroscience 209
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 138
- Gender Studies 115
Countries citing papers authored by Amy C. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy C. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy C. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy C. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy C. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy C. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy C. Lewis. The network helps show where Amy C. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy C. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy C. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy C. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy C. Lewis. Amy C. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Raising the Bar: Differential Expectations for Ingroup performance | 1 |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 77 | |
| 12 | 469 | |
| 13 | Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.breakdown → | 502 |
| 14 | Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships. | 62 |
| 15 | 1 |
About Amy C. Lewis
Amy C. Lewis is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Transportation and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers) and Transportation Planning and Optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (659 citations), Applied Psychology (111 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (854 citations). Amy C. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven J. Sherman, David L. Hamilton, Brian Lickel, Grażyna Wieczorkowska, Matthew T. Crawford, Allen R. McConnell, Francis West, Megan Elliott, Hannah Watson and C Wallace. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.