Amy C. Janes
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Marc J. KaufmanBlaise B. FrederickA. Eden EvinsMaurizio FavaDiego A. PizzagalliBlaise deB. FrederickLisa D. NickersonGladys N. Pachas
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (30 papers)Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (22 papers)Smoking Behavior and Cessation (19 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Amy C. Janes
69 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 480
- Molecular Biology 472
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 450
- Physiology 335
Countries citing papers authored by Amy C. Janes
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy C. Janes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy C. Janes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy C. Janes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy C. Janes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy C. Janes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy C. Janes. The network helps show where Amy C. Janes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy C. Janes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy C. Janes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy C. Janes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy C. Janes. Amy C. Janes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 74 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Amy C. Janes
Amy C. Janes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (30 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (22 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (450 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (480 citations). Amy C. Janes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marc J. Kaufman, Blaise B. Frederick, A. Eden Evins, Maurizio Fava, Diego A. Pizzagalli, Blaise deB. Frederick, Lisa D. Nickerson, Gladys N. Pachas, Scott E. Lukas and Stacey Farmer. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Medicine, PLoS ONE and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.