Richard T. Liu

12.3k citations
132 papers · 6.8k indexed · 5 hit papers · h-index 43

Richard T. Liu

122 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Hit Papers

Prevalence and Corre...1452010202620152020100200300400500

Peers

Richard T. Liu
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Clinical Psychology 4.7k
  • Biological Psychiatry 422
  • Social Psychology 2.0k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 310
Replace Marco Innamorati with:
Marco Innamorati Italy
Marco Sarchiapone Italy
Vladimir Carli Sweden
Lilly Shanahan United States
Kees van Heeringen Belgium
Brandon E. Gibb United States
Marcy Burstein United States
Thomas M. Olino United States
Alexander J. Millner United States
Anette Kersting Germany
Richard T. Liu relative to Marco Innamorati Italy Marco Innamorati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Marco Innamorati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard T. Liu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard T. Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard T. Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard T. Liu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard T. Liu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard T. Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard T. Liu. The network helps show where Richard T. Liu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard T. Liu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard T. Liu Line = papers co-authored together Richard T. Liu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20250
3 20245
4 20244
5 20241
6 202317
7 202144
8 202116
9 202112
10 202140
11 202112
12 202143
13 20200
14 201827
15 20187
16 201761
17 201739
18
Childhood maltreatment and non-suicidal self-injury: a systematic review and meta-analysisbreakdown →
2017227
19 201633
20 201213

About Richard T. Liu

Richard T. Liu is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Biological Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 132 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (72 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (60 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (19 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (16 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (13 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (13 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (4.7k citations), Biological Psychiatry (422 citations) and Social Psychology (2.0k citations). Richard T. Liu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lauren B. Alloy, Evan M. Kleiman, Brian Mustanski, Rachel F.L. Walsh, Ana E. Sheehan, Shayna M. Cheek, Ivan W. Miller, Alexandra H. Bettis, Taylor A. Burke and Bridget A. Nestor. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and American Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026