Nathan Hager

606 citations
31 papers · 411 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Hager

28 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Nathan Hager
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 189
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 111
  • Applied Psychology 24
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 75
  • Clinical Psychology 81
Replace Patrick A. McConnell with:
Patrick A. McConnell United States
Tam T. Nguyen‐Louie United States
Scott C. Wollman United States
Omar M. Mahmood United States
Judi Wakeley United Kingdom
K. J. Brower United States
Jennifer L. Winward United States
Keanan J. Joyner United States
Saeid Yazdi‐Ravandi Iran
Philip Lau United States
Nathan Hager relative to Patrick A. McConnell United States Patrick A. McConnell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Patrick A. McConnell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Hager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Hager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Hager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Hager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Hager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Hager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Hager. The network helps show where Nathan Hager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Hager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Hager Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Hager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201478
2 201538
3 201832
4 201631
5 201728
6 201526
7 201825
8 202221
9 201619
10 202015
11 201613
12 201712
13 201910
14 20157
15 20167
16 20197
17 20207
18 20226
19 20216
20 20245

About Nathan Hager

Nathan Hager is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (11 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (189 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (111 citations), Applied Psychology (24 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (75 citations) and Clinical Psychology (81 citations). Nathan Hager has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Teresa R. Franklin, Reagan R. Wetherill, Kanchana Jagannathan, Hengyi Rao, Anna Rose Childress, Matt R. Judah, Barbara Johnson, Joel Mumma, Zhuo Fang and Ze Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychology, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, Addiction Biology, Scientific Reports and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact