Leah Bernardo

504 total citations
10 papers, 317 citations indexed

About

Leah Bernardo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology and Behavioral Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Leah Bernardo has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 317 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Physiology and 3 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Leah Bernardo's work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers). Leah Bernardo is often cited by papers focused on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers). Leah Bernardo collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Afghanistan. Leah Bernardo's co-authors include Caryn Lerman, Mary Falcone, James Loughead, Rebecca L. Ashare, E. Paul Wileyto, Anthony L. Rostain, J. Russell Ramsay, Roy H. Hamilton, Nicole Cooper and Robert Hornik and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Psychopharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Leah Bernardo

9 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Leah Bernardo United States	8	165	132	93	69	38	10	317
Karolina Kozak Canada	8	110 0.7×	79 0.6×	95 1.0×	53 0.8×	35 0.9×	14	374
Giovanna Bubbico Italy	12	165 1.0×	33 0.3×	85 0.9×	51 0.7×	47 1.2×	17	342
Rachel Kaskie United States	9	252 1.5×	59 0.4×	82 0.9×	172 2.5×	25 0.7×	13	354
Sanne Koops Netherlands	13	235 1.4×	130 1.0×	196 2.1×	79 1.1×	17 0.4×	34	465
Mathijs Franssen Belgium	9	164 1.0×	94 0.7×	56 0.6×	45 0.7×	37 1.0×	17	271
Congpei Zhang China	6	195 1.2×	40 0.3×	144 1.5×	75 1.1×	19 0.5×	12	343
Xinyu Cao China	9	157 1.0×	123 0.9×	36 0.4×	38 0.6×	12 0.3×	19	281
Guixian Tang China	10	157 1.0×	40 0.3×	128 1.4×	48 0.7×	17 0.4×	24	329
Clément Dondé France	15	271 1.6×	138 1.0×	229 2.5×	85 1.2×	12 0.3×	51	510
Alica C. Dieler Germany	11	269 1.6×	133 1.0×	38 0.4×	73 1.1×	14 0.4×	13	415

Countries citing papers authored by Leah Bernardo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leah Bernardo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah Bernardo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah Bernardo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leah Bernardo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah Bernardo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah Bernardo. The network helps show where Leah Bernardo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leah Bernardo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leah Bernardo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leah Bernardo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leah Bernardo. Leah Bernardo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

White, David, Laura M. Dember, Caroline Wilkie, et al.. (2025). Patient Engagement in the Design and Conduct of the HOPE Trial. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 20(10). 1461–1469.

2.

Bernardo, Leah, et al.. (2023). Behavioral Economic Strategies to Improve Enrollment Rates in Clinical Research: Embedded Recruitment Pilot Trial. JMIR Formative Research. 7. e47121–e47121. 2 indexed citations

3.

Falcone, Mary, E. Paul Wileyto, Leah Bernardo, et al.. (2019). Neural cue reactivity during acute abstinence predicts short‐term smoking relapse. Addiction Biology. 25(2). e12733–e12733. 28 indexed citations

4.

Falcone, Mary, Rebecca L. Ashare, Leah Bernardo, et al.. (2019). Brain Marker Links Stress and Nicotine Abstinence. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 22(6). 885–891. 9 indexed citations

5.

Falcone, Mary, Leah Bernardo, E. Paul Wileyto, et al.. (2018). Lack of effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on short-term smoking cessation: Results of a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 194. 244–251. 17 indexed citations

6.

Falcone, Mary, Leah Bernardo, E. Paul Wileyto, et al.. (2018). Transcranial direct current brain stimulation decreases impulsivity in ADHD. Brain stimulation. 11(5). 974–981. 88 indexed citations

7.

Kable, Joseph W., Mary Falcone, Leah Bernardo, et al.. (2017). No Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance. Journal of Neuroscience. 37(31). 7390–7402. 76 indexed citations

8.

Ashare, Rebecca L., Caryn Lerman, Mary Falcone, et al.. (2016). Nicotine withdrawal alters neural responses to psychosocial stress. Psychopharmacology. 233(13). 2459–2467. 22 indexed citations

9.

Falcone, Mary, et al.. (2015). Brain Responses to Smoking Cues Differ Based on Nicotine Metabolism Rate. Biological Psychiatry. 80(3). 190–197. 25 indexed citations

10.

Falcone, Mary, Leah Bernardo, Rebecca L. Ashare, et al.. (2015). Transcranial Direct Current Brain Stimulation Increases Ability to Resist Smoking. Brain stimulation. 9(2). 191–196. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact