Amory Clarke
About
In The Last Decade
Amory Clarke
8 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Clinical Psychology 280
- Psychiatry and Mental health 138
- Social Psychology 85
- Sociology and Political Science 57
- Cognitive Neuroscience 48
Countries citing papers authored by Amory Clarke
This map shows the geographic impact of Amory Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amory Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amory Clarke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amory Clarke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amory Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amory Clarke. The network helps show where Amory Clarke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amory Clarke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amory Clarke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amory Clarke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amory Clarke. Amory Clarke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 60 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 133 | |
| 9 | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.