Mary L. Phillips
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.05%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.02%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.05%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Wayne C. DrevetsRichard D. LaneScott L. RauchDavid J. KupferAnthony S. DavidSteven WilliamsCecile D. LadouceurMichael Brammer
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (119 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (88 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (45 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Mary L. Phillips
306 papers receiving 27.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
- Cognitive Neuroscience 15.6k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 10.1k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 8.2k
- Clinical Psychology 7.3k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 3.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Mary L. Phillips
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary L. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary L. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary L. Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary L. Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary L. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary L. Phillips. The network helps show where Mary L. Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary L. Phillips
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary L. Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary L. Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary L. Phillips. Mary L. Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 62 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 167 | |
| 15 | 114 | |
| 16 | 73 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 97 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | Response to aversive stimuli in depersonalization disorder: Neural activation patterns in two patients before and after treatment with lamotrigine | 1 |
About Mary L. Phillips
Mary L. Phillips is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 314 papers that have together received 28.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (119 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (88 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (45 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (15.6k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (10.1k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (8.2k citations). Mary L. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Wayne C. Drevets, Richard D. Lane, Scott L. Rauch, David J. Kupfer, Anthony S. David, Steven Williams, Cecile D. Ladouceur, Michael Brammer, Jorge Almeida and Natalia Lawrence. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.